Discovering the Other Architect (written in 2021)

We expect discoveries to occur in specific places. We expect them to be made by specific people and we expect them to be shared in a specific way. If your neighbor told you he made a discovery, you wouldn’t believe it. If someone with three hundred followers posted something about making a discovery, you would have trouble thinking they were telling the truth.

We’ve always been this way. If you lived during the time when everyone thought the world was flat and your neighbor told you he could prove to you that it was round, you wouldn’t believe it. If someone in the town or village you lived in who was seen as someone of no importance told you they could prove the world was round you wouldn’t be interested. You would’ve expected something like that to be shared in a specific way by a specific person or group of people.

The place we expect scientific discoveries to be made is in a science lab at a university. We believe science is something academic and that the people who make discoveries are academics. You would only believe your neighbor made a discovery if your neighbor was doing research at a lab in a university. You would only believe a post by someone claiming to have made a discovery if their profile, or their other posts, made it clear that they were an academic doing research at a university. If you do an internet search on the subject of non-academics making discoveries, you’ll find articles about scientists who didn’t get the credit they deserved and you’ll see “ignored discoveries” and “famous scientists without degrees” in related searches. “Famous scientists without degrees” will lead you to a Wikipedia article entitled “List of autodidacts”. One of the autodidacts listed is Charles Darwin, a non-academic who most people consider to be one of the greatest scientists who ever lived. Galileo Galilei and Michael Faraday are also on the list. By looking any of these non-academic scientists up and reading about their work and their discoveries, it becomes obvious that our belief that discoveries can only be made in labs at universities is completely wrong.

Discoveries are made in labs at universities, but they’re also made in non-academic settings by non-academics. I know this is true because I am a non-academic who made a discovery in a non-academic setting. Because I made a discovery, I can tell you what making a discovery is like, what it’s like to try to share a discovery, what concerns you have when you make a discovery, and what you need to find after making one.

I made the discovery in July of 2017. In 2018, I began writing about it. I wrote eight articles. I wrote the articles in a way that simulated the experience of making the discovery.

Article 1 was an introduction.

Here is the first half of the article:

“In 2008, evolutionary biologist Leonid Kruglyak said something profound on the subject of finding the solution to the missing heritability problem, ‘It’s a possibility that it’s so different from what we’re thinking about that we’re not thinking about it yet.’

“When he said that, unbeknownst to him, a young scientist around a thousand miles away was doing research which would eventually lead to the solution to the missing heritability problem. The solution came as the result of a series of (thousands) of discoveries which began in 2002. I will be sharing these discoveries, as well as the solution to the missing heritability problem, with you in informal articles beginning with this one.

“First, let me explain what makes the solution to the missing heritability problem important. With our current incomplete understanding of life, there are several things we can’t do (because there are several things we don’t really understand). Our current understanding of obesity, heart disease, schizophrenia, and cancer, as well as of other diseases and disorders, is not going to lead us to ever curing them or preventing them. Once the world is familiar with what I’m going to share in these articles, we’ll finally reach a point where prevention of many of these diseases and disorders will be possible.

“Without the understanding of life that the solution to the missing heritability problem is going to give us, survival on other planets is not possible. This is important because two corporations and a government agency plan on sending people to live on Mars, and without the technology that can only come into existence with what I am going to share with you none of the people going to Mars are going to survive.

“When you study genetics, you run into the phrase ‘genetic architecture’. What you don’t run into is the phrase ‘genetic architect’. This is because we assume there’s no need to mention it. We assume there is one genetic architect – one force, or process, which is responsible for all genetic architecture. We learn about this architect in school. We learn that we get our genes through the mechanisms of inheritance and random mutation. When random mutations are advantageous to our survival, they get passed on and our species evolves. This process is the one and only genetic architect and is supposed to explain everything that happens on the genetic level – but it doesn’t.

“Many genetic disorders have reached epidemic proportions. Among them are obesity, heart disease, and cancer. The heritability of these disorders is missing (obesity has the highest heritability, while some cancers have heritability as low as 1%). They’re too widespread to be the result of random mutations. Unhealthy lifestyle does contribute and many cancers are caused by pollution, radiation, and infection, but these diseases and disorders existed long before pollution and our unhealthy way of living. There is evidence that obesity and heart disease existed in prehistoric times. There are written records of cancer from as early as 1600 BC.

“Where does the predisposition to having these disorders come from? Some people carry the gene variants (single nucleotide polymorphisms) that are associated with these disorders, but the phenotype never gets expressed, something known as incomplete penetrance. So these people acquire genes with mutations, but their genes don’t have a predisposition to expressing the phenotype of the disease. What accounts for the predisposition to what phenotypes are expressed? Heredity may account for a small percentage, but what accounts for the rest (the majority)? If you look a little more deeply into obesity, you’ll find that people with the predisposition for obesity have a predisposition for other disorders as well. These include PCOS (polycystic ovary syndrome), hypothyroidism, metabolic disorder, endometriosis, diabetes, and hyperestrogenism. Basically, it’s a predisposition to endocrine system problems. You could say that the predisposition is toward having problems with the glands (hormones), but that different people express different endotypes. If you find out what causes the predisposition, then you’re in a position where you can stop the disorder before it happens. Heredity and random mutation don’t provide us with the causes. They are a part of the reason these disorders exist, but their part is not as all-determining as we have been taught to believe. In 2002, I began discovering genetic predispositions for groups of phenotypes (disease phenotypes as well as physical phenotypes) and I’ve been steadily making discoveries for over sixteen years. In 2017, I discovered what causes the predispositions.

“The cause is not heredity, it isn’t random mutation, and it doesn’t lead to evolution. In other words, it isn’t the genetic architect that was discovered in the 1800s. What I’ve been in the process of discovering since 2002 is another genetic architect.”

Article 2 has lists of famous people who have physical phenotypes and disease phenotypes from ten different epigenetic predispositions. Article 3 has lists of famous people who have physical phenotypes and disease phenotypes from twenty four different epigenetic predispositions (programs). Article 4 has lists of famous people who have physical phenotypes and disease phenotypes from twenty four different epigenetic predispositions. Article 5 has lists of famous people who have physical phenotypes and disease phenotypes from eighteen different epigenetic predispositions.

I used lists of famous people because information about them is public information.

Here are a few samples of the lists:

[Program 7 red skin tone] William Atherton, Ruth Bakke, Gareth Batty, Wade Belak, Francie Bellew, Larry Bird, Hazel Blears, David Blunkett, Paul Brady, Timothy Busfield, Kim Campbell, Peter Harry Cartensen, Richard Carwardine, Larry Clapp, Bill Clinton, George S. Clinton, Richard Codey, Ike Davis, Quint Davis, Gardner Dozois, Ryan Dunn, Roky Erickson, Gerhard Ertl, Jon Favreau, George Ferguson, John M. Ford, Edward Fox, Grégory Gadebois, Jim Gaffigan, Jon Gosselin, Nick Greiner, Richard Griffiths, Sammy Hagar, Daryl Hall, Robert David Hall, Jessica Hardy, Pye Hastings, Charles Hendry, Julian Hipwood, Philip Seymour Hoffman, Chris Hoke, Rupert Holmes, Jeffrey Jones, Philip Kaufman, Patrick J. Kennedy, Philippe Kirsch, Norman Lamb, Glen A. Larson, Ivan Lawrence, Ryan Leaf, Denis Leary, Conrad Logan, Alistair MacLeod, Kenneth Mars, John Monie, Richard Morris (archaeologist), Tristan Murail, Peter Noone, Vladimir Oravsky, Jonathan Palmer, James Patterson, David Pountney, John Reid, Baron Reid of Cardowan, Jodi Rell, Howard Rheingold, Eric Robson, Dick Roche, Allan Rock, Maurice Roeves, Walter Röhrl, Kelly Schumacher, Kevin Sheedy, Ronald Sørensen, Stewart Stevenson (politician), John Sullivan (writer), Ufuk Talay, Rick Wakeman, Eric F. Wieschaus, Wooly Wolstenholme, Sam Young (football player)

[Program 35 long necks] David Aebischer, Feo Aladag, Ana Alexander, Joe Alexander, Jérôme Alonzo, Suzan Anbeh, Gabrielle Anwar, Joe Anyon, Hale Appleman, Billie Joe Armstrong, Michèle Arnaud, Isabelle Arnould, Nadja Auermann, Julie Augustyniak, Grant Balfour, Sabine Bätzing-Lichtenthäler, Matthew Beard, Mirja Becker, Ramzy Bedia, Frédérique Bedos, Jason Behr, Éric Bélanger, Sofia Bekatorou, Jeff Bezos, Rico Blanco, Dejan Bodiroga, Brennan Boesch, Patricio Borghetti, Laurence Borremans, Corinne Boulangier, Luc Bourdon, Julie Bowen, Brandon Boyd, Annalise Braakensiek, Vanessa Branch, Michael Brecker, Brennan Benjamin Burnley, Adrian Burnside, Valyantsin Byalkevich, Maurizia Cacciatori, Joan Capdevila, Fabian Carini, Carlota Castrejana, Matt Cedeño, Marouane Chamakh, Zdeno Chára, Valerie Chow, Claudia Ciesla, Andrea Cleven, Mariana Coldebella, Lynnette Cole, Daniel Congré, Tim Cook, Grégory Coupet, Nicolas Coutelot, Candice Crawford, Pierre Dagenais, John Danks, Caroline de Maigret, Dana Delany, Marco Delvecchio (footballer), Sophie Desmarets, Laurie Dhue, Yohann Diniz, Papa Bouba Diop, Sylvain Distin, Novak Djokovic, Rahul Dravid, Léa Drucker, Dinara Drukarova, Doris Duke, Bonnie J. Dunbar, Aurélie Dupont, Colin Egglesfield, Shane Elford, Arié Elmaleh, Adam Everett, Stefano Ferrario, Stephen Fleming, Audrey Fleurot, James Frain, Ryan Franklin (baseball player), Amber Frey, Mathieu Garon, Anna Gavalda, Glenda Gilson, Charles Gipson, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Simon Gosejohann, Bojana Gregorić-Vejzović, Hélène Grémillon, Ingrid Grudke, Vladimir Guerrero, Elisabeth Hakel, Laeticia Hallyday, Richard Hamilton, Christopher Hampson (choreographer), Marina Hands, Jesper Hansen, Brooke Hanson, Atiqah Hasiholan, Tia Hellebaut, Darren Helm, Jill Hennessy, Eva Herzigová, Roy Hibbert, Tom Hiddleston, Julia Butterfly Hill, Taylor Hill, Peter Hoekstra (footballer), Craig Horner, Helena Houdová, Juwan Howard, Andriy Husin, Miriam Hyde, Julio Iglesias, Jr., Natalie Imbruglia, Philippe Jaroussky, Rula Jebreal, Lady Bird Johnson, Rusty Joiner, Kris Joseph, Jimmy Journell, Ksenia Kahnovich, Kang Daniel, Abdul Hafeez Kardar, Liya Kebede, Kerri Kenney-Silver, Clayton Kershaw, Kim Sa-rang, Dave Kingman, Jovan Kirovski, David Knight (footballer), Franziska Knuppe, Ruud Krol, Edvinas Krungolcas, Filip Kuba, Tiiu Kuik, Stéphane Lambiel, Davide Lanzafame, Maxim Lapierre, Lucie Laurier, Andrew LeClerq, Jules Léger, Miriam Leone, Agnès Letestu, Katia Lewkowicz, Paul Leyden, Kellie Lightbourn, Matthew Lillard, Lisa (rapper), Ruth Lister, Hugo Lloris, Shane Long, Rachel Maddow, Mark Madsen, Flavio Maestri, Claude Makélélé, Manuela Maleeva, Shirley Mallmann, Petra Mandula, Jonathan Mangum, Alessia Marcuzzi, Ken Marino, Jason Marsalis, Chan Marshall, Chris Martin, Benedetta Massola, Naoki Matsuda, Brian Matusz, Kenny McKinley, Steve McNair, Jaydy Michel, Heather Mills, Karen Minier, Susan Misner, Katherine Moennig, Diana Moldovan, Romina Mondello, Alonzo Mourning, Andi Muise, Jamie Murray, Paulo Musse, Valérie Nicolas, Miguel Ángel Nieto, Najwa Nimri, Owen Nolan, Jerry O’Connell, Erin O’Connor, Flannery O’Connor, Osgar O’Hoisin, Tzipora Obziler, Kevin Ollie, Ömer Onan, Beth Orton, Christian Panucci, Papoose, Park Sol-mi, Jim Parsons, Ashmit Patel, John Patterson (baseball player), Corey Perry, Chynna Phillips, Joe Pichler, Mary Pierce, Andrew Poje, Claudia Poll, Princess Marie of Denmark, Paula Radcliffe, Wes Ramsey, Kim Raver, Dani Reeves, Efthimios Rentzias, Rick Reuschel, The Rev, Anne-Gaëlle Riccio, Jason Roberts (footballer), Stéphane Robidas, Cristiano Ronaldo, Shiva Rose, Hrithik Roshan, Will Rothhaar, Matthias Rott, Brian Russell (football player), Ève Salvail, Holly Samos, Hildi Santo-Tomas, Sapho (singer), Andrea Savage, Kristen Schaal, Brenda Schultz-McCarthy, Matthias Schwarz (footballer), Byron Scott, Jason-Shane Scott, Gil Scott-Heron, Rick Short, Anton Shunin, Eugenia Silva, Josip Šimunić, Darius Songaila, Ryan Star, Brian Stepanek, Julia Stinshoff, Bob Sura, Stella Tannant, Niki Taylor, Hannah Taylor-Gordon, Zephyr Teachout, Miloš Teodosić, Hasheem Thabeet, Megumi Toyoguchi, Arda Turan, Tatiana Turanskaya, Laurita Valenzuela, Daniel Van Buyten, James Van Der Beek, Sara Varone, Paz Vega, Valentina Vezzali, Kenny Watson (football player), Ulla Werbrouck, Caroline Winberg, Charlene Wittstock, Marcel Wouda, Carolyn D. Wright, Katie Wright, Zendaya, Igor Zikovic, Jan Zimmermann, Ante Žižić, Sergejs Žoltoks

[Program 41 strabismus] Daniel Andrews, Deborah Anthonioz, Marc Anthony, Piers Anthony, Mónica Ayos, Ernesto Pérez Balladares, Claude Berri, Raúl González Blanco, Beulah Bonds, E. R. Braithwaite, Alex Brooks, David Brower, Indy de Vroome, Ki Hajar Dewantara, Mamadou Dia, Zach Duke, Monique Evans, Marty Feldman, Dorothy Gilman, Topher Grace, Michael Graves, Ingeborg Hallstein, Renny Harlin, R. James Harvey, Brian Hayward, Jim Henson, Jacob Joseph (coach), Gordon Kaye, Kevin Kennedy, Patrick J. Kennedy, Ed Kowalczyk, Billy Laughlin, Curtis Martin, Federico Mattiello, Willy Messerschmitt, Kweisi Mfume, Drusilla Modjeska, Steve Morrow, Oliver Napier, Erik Nool, Jessye Norman, David Pegg (footballer), Amol Rajan, Aaron Sele, Maria Lourdes Sereno, Fabienne Serrat, Beatriz Sheridan, Kenjiro Shinozuka, Timothy Shriver, Soundarya, Aaron Spelling, Tom Springfield, John St. Clair (football player), Otto Georg Thierack, Patrick Timsit, Toine van Peperstraten, Prince Egon von Fürstenberg, J. Ernest Wilkins, Clara Zetkin

[Program 41 peaked eyebrows] Sherman Alexie, Paul Thomas Anderson, Thomas Anderson, David Archuleta, Rudolf Arnheim, Cristian Baroni, Dominique Besnehard, Jean-Pierre Blackburn, Rico Blanco, Con Blatsis, E. R. Braithwaite, Pierre Cardin, Patrick Catalifo, Tyler Christopher, Michael Crafter, Ian Anthony Dale, Jeremiah Denton, William Dieterle, Walter Egan, Jamie Elman, Julien Féret, Stephen Fleming, Kevin A. Ford, Cary Fukunaga, Kip Gamblin, Bert Hölldobler, Nick Karner, Tadhg Kennelly, D. J. King, Jean Le Mouel, James Martin (chef), Leopoldo Mastelloni, Mark McKinney, Thomas Morrison, Eduardo Najera, David O'Hara, Baard Owe, Émile Peynaud, JP Pietersen, Tom Price, Artimus Pyle, Jason Rhoades, Robin Shou, Joe Spano, Donald Sutherland, Yoshito Takamine, Jiro Taniguchi, Evgeny Tomashevsky, William F. Walsh, Stephen Wolfram, Sakon Yamamoto, Chakrit Yamnam, Burak Yılmaz, Jamie Zubairi

[Program 43 mental disorders and gastrointestinal disorders]

Borderline Personality Disorder:

Rodney Alcala, Jodi Arias, Ruthann Aron, Madison Bailey, Alyssa Dailene Bustamente, Alton Coleman, Stan Collymore, Farah Damji, Doc Corbin Dart, Nicola Edgington, Larry Eyler, Megan Fox, Melissa Huckaby, Todd Kohlhepp, Tania Lacy, Marsha M. Linehan, Marilyn Monroe, Amber Leann Portwood, Kenny Richey, Stuart Shorter, Kjartan Slettemark, Danielle Steel, Mikey Welsh

Sociopathy:

Jack Henry Abbott, Roseanne Barr, Elizabeth Báthory, Ted Bundy, Diane Downs, John Wayne Gacy, Jeffrey R. MacDonald, Billy McFarland, Sean Penn

Psychopathy:

Arthur Lee Allen, David Berkowitz, Ted Bundy, Adolf Eichmann, Albert Fish, Ed Gein, H. H. Holmes, King Leopold II, Charles Manson, Pol Pot, Vlad the Impaler

Alzheimer’s:

Paul T. Adwell, Eddie Albert, Balamani Amma, William Asher, Paul Avrich, Terry Barry, Arthur E. Bartlett, Giorgio Bassani, Skip Battin, Thomas Beck, Jim Bellows, Enid Blyton, James Brooks (painter), Arthur Burks, Sam Butera, Max Bygraves, Audrey Callaghan, Frances Chaney, Robert M. Chanock, Sam Chapman, Aaron Copland, Charlie Crowe, Marion Cunningham, Keith Davey, Raymond Davis, Jr., Kaúlza de Arriaga, Willem de Kooning, Katherine DeMille, Auguste Deter, Vivian Duncan, Herb Ellis, John Elsworthy, Lowell English, Carl Fontana, Maureen Forrester, Rikki Fulton, Fernando Romeo Lucas García, S. I. Hayakawa, Jean Hazlewood, Jesse Hibbs, Arthur Hill, Stanley Hiller, Walter E. Hussman, Sr., Isidore Isou, Valentin Kozmich Ivanov, Sneaky Pete Kleinow, Tony Knap, Howard W. Koch, Laura La Plante, Don Lane, Paul Lindblad, David Lunceford, Ross Macdonald, Charlotte MacLeod, Frank MacShane, Toni Mannix, Christian Marquand, William Marshall, Henry McGee, Dale Meinert, Pierre Michelot, Iris Murdoch, Tharon Musser, Leonard Nathan, John Neville, Edmond O'Brien, Marv Owen, Wally Phillips, Otto Preminger, William Proxmire, Berthe Qvistgaard, Russ Ramsay, Pietro Rava, Eddie Robinson, Margaret Rutherford, Pat Saward, William Lloyd Scott, Claude Shannon, Norma Shearer, Paul Smith (composer), Ernie Stautner, Sammy Steamboat, Abbye Pudgy Stockton, Pat Summitt, Kay Swift, Lucky Thompson, Cornelius Warmerdam, Charles F. Wheeler, Harold Wilson, Jeff Young, Malcolm Young, Gordon Zahn

Bipolar disorder:

Andrea Breth, Jeremy Brett, Chris Brown, Frank Bruno, Barney Bubbles, Robert Campeau, Jim Carrey, Eason Chan, Vincent Crane, Disco D, John Daly, Honoré de Balzac, Lenny Dee, DMX, Eric Douglas, Robert Downey, Jr., Charmaine Dragun, Thomas Eagleton, Larry Flynt, Stephen Fry, Peter Gabriel, Alan Garner, Matthew Good, Phil Graham, Jonathan Hay, Kristin Hersh, Jack Irons, Kerry Katona, Debra Lafave, Mary Kay Letourneau, Oscar Levant, Demi Lovato, Kristy McNichol, Kate Millett, Marilyn Monroe, Ben Moody, Ilie Năstase, John Ogdon, Pierre Péladeau, Fernando Pessoa, Gail Porter, Emil Post, Heinz C. Prechter, Mac Rebennack, Axl Rose, Don Simpson, Frank Sinatra, Michael Slater, Alonzo Spellman, Scott Stapp, Peter Steele, Sting, Darryl Strawberry, Steven Thomas (entrepreneur), Townes Van Zandt, David Walliams, Ruby Wax, Scott Weiland, Delonte West, Norman Wexler, Brian Wilson, Luther Wright, Bert Yancey

Depression:

Louie Anderson, Richard Ashcroft, Julian Assange, Roseanne Barr, Amanda Beard, Samuel Beckett, Manchem Begin, Irving Berlin, Hector Berlioz, Halle Berry, William Blake, Jon Bon Jovi, Clara Bow, Cheyenne Brando, Frank Bruno, Joe Budden, Delta Burke, Barbara Bush, Truman Capote, Drew Carey, Jim Carrey, Helena Bonham Carter, Leonard Cohen, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, Stan Collymore, Catherine Cookson, Sheryl Crow, Jonathan Davis, Osamu Dazai, Guy de Maupassant, Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, Jack Dee, Sandra Dee, John Denver, Johnny Depp, Kirsten Dunst, Adam Duritz, Thomas Eagleton, Blake Edwards, William Faulkner, Craig Ferguson, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Harrison Ford, Jackson C. Frank, Stephen Fry, Peter Gabriel, Geoff Gallop, Paul Gauguin, Carlo Gesualdo, Oliver Goldsmith, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Francisco Goya, Tim Gunn, Jon Hamm, Tony Hancock, Elizabeth Hartman, Juliana Hatfield, Paige Hemmis, Bill Hicks, Gerard Manley Hopkins, Bryce Dallas Howard, Frankie Howerd, Julian Huxley, Jack Irons, Henry James, Ashley Judd, Franz Kafka, Sarah Kane, Alicia Keys, Anthony Kiedis, Andrew Koenig, Hugh Laurie, Neil Lennon, Meriwether Lewis, Heather Locklear, Jack London, Demi Lovato, Salvador Luria, Brian May, Vladimir Mayakovsky, Ewan McGregor, Herman Melville, Melinda Messenger, George Michael, Edna St. Vincent Millay, Joan Miró, Matthew Mitcham, Marilyn Monroe, Ben Moody, Mandy Moore, Alanis Morissette, Ilie Năstase, Deborah Norville, Rosie O'Donnell, Georgia O'Keefe, Jenny Pat, Amanda Peet, Matthew Perry, Gail Porter, Ezra Pound, Lou Reed, Anne Rice, Hans Rott, J. K. Rowling, Winona Ryder, Yves Saint-Laurent, Jean Seberg, Amanda Seyfried, Percy Bysshe Shelley, Sarah Silverman, Paul Simon, Elliott Smith, Rick Springfield, Aaron Stainthorpe, Vivian Stanshall, Peter Steele, Rod Steiger, Sting, William Styron, T. I. (rapper), Tablo (rapper), Alfred Lord Tennyson, Hunter Tylo, Vivian Vance, Ned Vizzini, Kurt Vonnegut, David Foster Wallace, David Walliams, Andre Waters, Evelyn Waugh, Ruby Wax, Delonte West, Wil Wheaton, Kevin Whitrick, Kenneth Williams, Alan Wilson, Brian Wilson, Reese Witherspoon, Hugo Wolf, Tom Wolfe, Ed Wood, Elizabeth Wurtzel, Tammy Wynette, Michael Yardy

Schizophrenia:

Antonin Artaud, Clara Bow, Nicole Edgington, Eduard Einstein, Zelda Fitzgerald, Adele Hugo, Ted Kaczynski, John Ogdon, Katherine Routledge, Louis Wain, Hannah Weiner, Brian Wilson

Anorexia nervosa:

Jessica Alba, Kate Beckinsale, Karen Carpenter, Sandra Dee, Susan Dey, Elisa Donovan, Irene Fenwick, Sally Field, Jane Fonda, Geri Halliwell, Katherine Jenkins, Franz Kafka, Gelsey Kirkland, Demi Lovato, Evanna Lynch, Alanis Morissette, Barbara Niven, Dolores O'Riordan, Mary-Kate Olsen, Eliana Ramos, Ana Carolina Reston, Diana Ross

Bulimia:

Paula Abdul, Catherine Bell, Chyna, David Coulthard, Susan Dey, Sally Field, Jane Fonda, Geri Halliwell, Whitney Houston, Sue Johnston, Ryan Jarman, Leighton Jordan, Demi Lovato, Maureen McCormick, Alanis Morissette, Brittany Murphy, Sharon Osbourne, Catherine Oxenberg, Scarlett Pomers, Jaime Pressly, Ally Sheedy, Jamie-Lynn Sigler

Crohn’s disease:

Ken Baumann, Pierre Carette, Shayne Corson, Shannen Doherty, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Theoren Fleury, Chris Gedney, Carrie Grant, Seantrel Henderson, Jim Hickey (broadcaster), Nicky Hopkins, Thomas Menino, Mary Ann Mobley, Larry Nance, Jr., Beth Orton, Daryl Palumbo, Steve Redgrave, Joe Rogan, Jerry Sadowitz

Celiac disease:

Drew Brees, Jim Carrey, Jennifer Esposito, Scott Michael Foster, Tom Laughlin, Sarah Vowell

ADHD:

Ansel Adams, Harry Anderson, Hans Asperger, Richard Branson, Emily Brontë, George H. W. Bush, George W. Bush, Jim Carrey, Lewis Carroll, Charles, Prince of Wales, William Clark, Tom Cruise, Harvey Cushing, John Denver, Dwight D. Eisenhower, Ralph Waldo Emerson, F. Scott Fitzgerald, Henry Ford, Megan Fox, Ryan Gosling, Cammi Granato, Stephen Hawking, Mariel Hemingway, Paris Hilton, Alfred Hitchcock, Dustin Hoffman, Rachel Hurd-Wood, Magic Johnson, Evel Knievel, Adam Kreek, Greg LeMond, Meriwether Lewis, James Clerk Maxwell, Napoleon, Ashley Olsen, Mary-Kate Olsen, Michael Palin, Louis Pasteur, Pablo Picasso, Sergei Rachmaninoff, Eddie Rickenbacker, George C. Scott, George Bernard Shaw, Tom Smothers, Channing Tatum, Justin Timberlake, Emma Watson, Russell White, Wilbur Wright, William Wrigley

OCD:

Dan Aykroyd, Jessica Alba, Roseann Barr, Harrison Ford, Megan Fox, Muammar Gaddafi, Steve Gerrard, Kathie Lee Gifford, Howard Hughes, Stanley Kubrick, Ernst Lanzer, Martin Luther, Daniel Radcliffe, J. K. Rowling, Frank Sinatra, Charlize Theron, Billy Bob Thornton, Justin Timberlake

dementia:

Sparky Anderson, Anthony Cave Brown

Tourette syndrome:

Dan Aykroyd, Eric Bernotas, André Malraux, Michael Wolff (pianist)

Trichotillomania:

Kate Beckinsale, Megan Fox, Olivia Munn, Charlize Theron, Justin Timberlake

IBS:

Alyce Crawford, Kirsten Dunst

Ulcerative colitis:

Shayne Corson, Chris Gedney, Hank Green, Chuck Lorre, Michael Mauti, Josh Mierkalns, Steve Redgrave, Georges St-Pierre, Hannah Witton

[Program 48 gray eyes] William Ash, Fernando Belluschi, Teddy Blass, Daryl Braithwaite, Lizzy Caplan, Anna Chlumsky, Vince Clark, Matt Dallas, Jenna Dewan, Katie Featherston, Ticia Gara, Guido Grünheid, Yotam Halperin, Joanna Horodyńska, Kristjan Kangur, Lilly King, Tereza Martincová, Damien Marty, Jay McClement, Linda McMahon, Dannii Minogue, Mike Moore (New Zealand politician), Nick Oliveri, Duncan Scott, Ryan Shannon, Kelly Shoppach, MyKayla Skinner, Charlotte Sullivan, Irene van Dyk, Stanislav Varga, Sebastián Vegas, Keiren Westwood, Jeremy Wright

[Program 53 strabismus] Thomas Aldridge, Joe Anyon, Egidio Arévalo, Romed Baumann, Thomas Berge, Juliet Berto, István Bibó, David Blunkett, Beulah Bonds, David Bowie, Winnie Byanyima, Jeff Carter, Tom Clancy, Earl Clark, Valentina Cortese, Ricardo Darin, Alvin Dark, Lise Darly, Clint Dempsey, Ki Hajar Dewantara, Ngô Đình Diệm, Jonathan Fanene, Dinko Felić, Matt Frattin, Clement Freud, Nikolaos Georgeas, Richard Griffiths, Allvar Gullstrand, Jim Henson, Calvin Hill, Annemarie Huber-Hotz, Hugh Kenner, Esteban Loaiza, Neil MacGregor, Curtis Martin, Christian McBride, Joshua John Miller, Kate Moss, Jimmy Osmond, Carson Palmer, Mike Pelfrey, Tyrone Phillips (rugby player), Graham Rahal, Jack Riley, Aníbal Sánchez, Ryan Scheckler, Dougray Scott, Maggie Smith, Ali Soumaré, Andrei Stoliarov, David Tennant, Otto Georg Thierack, Chris Vance, Denzel Washington, Steve Wiig, Athol Williams

[Program 55 hairline] Mohamed Aboutrika, Jill Balcon, Yasmine Bleeth, Sébastien Bosquet, Matteo Brighi, Eddie Brocken, Josh Brolin, Igor Budan, Erin Burger, Ronald Colman, Géza Csáth, Lisa Donahue, Nicolas Douchez, John Edward, Colin Egglesfield, Jessica Ennis-Hill, Leila Feinstein, China Forbes, Gaetano Giardino, Michael A. Goorjian, Jimmy Hoffa, Kelly Hu, Ylva Johansson, Bob Kurland, Davide Lanzafame, Will Yun Lee, Robyn Lively, Farveez Maharoof, Enzo Maresca, Tim Meadows, Wentworth Miller, Luke Moore, Donna Murphy, Darcy Dolce Neto, Najwa Nimri, John O’Shea, Pablo Pallante, Rhys Palmer, Joe Pichler, Dick Powell, Mike Richards, Daphné Roulier, Marnie Schulenburg, Jean-Jacques Servan-Schreiber, Chris Simon, Brent Stanton, Luis Suarez, Harold Sylvester, Ta-Tanisha, Ufuk Talay, Kathleen Turner, Daniel Van Buyten, April Walker, Catherine Warren (Miss Illinois), April Wilkner, Syamsul Yusof, Shōhōzan Yūya

[Program 63 corners of lips are long and/or curl upwards] Judit Ágoston-Mendelényi, Katharina Andersen, Michelle Ang, Christopher Atkins, Steve Austria, Camille Ayglon-Saurina, Stefano Baldini, Stephen Baldwin, Carolina Bang, Cliff Bastin, Meredith Baxter, Warren Beatty, Saskia Burmeister, Luke Benward, Hans Binder, Jonas Bjerre, Michael Ian Black, Ross Bleckner, Stjephan Bobek, Virginia Bottomley, Kerry Boustead, Wout Brama, Fernanda Brandão, Harald Brattbakk, Sarah Burke, Ben Burtt, Jeffrey Buttle, Kirk Cameron, Elisabetta Canalis, Marco Cappato, Bobby Carpenter, Rudi Carrell, Nathan Carter, Daniela Castillo, Sara Chase, Juan Ignacio Chela, Chrispa, Tom Cleverley, Adam Cooney, Jason Cram, Cory Cross, Emmanuel Culio, Alexander Dale Oen, Erin Daniels, Grete Dollitz, Sherri DuPree, Kenton Duty, Linda Eder, Donnie Edwards, Walter Egan, Lynndie England, Corrado Fabi, Keith Foulke, Jakob Fuglsang, Kazue Fukiishi, Bruno Gervais, Nick Gibb, Ira Glass, Sara Goller, Nancy Grace, Andy Grammer, Fred Grandy, Tracy Grimshaw, Alyson Hannigan, Yumi Hara, Anne Hathaway, Wings Hauser, Tubby Hayes, Dave Henderson, Jim Henderson (baseball player), Jennifer Hilton, Baroness Hilton of Eggardon, Elliot Hirshman, Tenzin Ösel Hita, Lucie Hradecká, Marat Izmailov, Sonia Johnson, Gideon Jung, Krystal Jung, James Kahn, Christian Karembeu, Alex Katz (baseball player), Hazal Kaya, Svetlana Khodchenkova, Kim Joo-hyuk, Moniek Kleinsman, Mike Knuble, Mikko Koivu, Hari Kondabolu, Joe Kopicki, Andrei Kostitsyn, John Kucera (ski racer), Mélanie Laurent, Elmar Liitmaa, Diana López (athlete), Nicolas Macrozonaris, Natalie Martinez, Juliana Martins, Claudia Mason, Stephen McHattie, Damian McKenzie, Andrea Mitchell, Joey Molland, Christopher Neame, Ryo Nishikido, Meghan Ory, Clio Pajczer, Travis Pastrana, Bárbara Paz, Gwendal Peizerat, Arno Pijpers, Lily Pons, Francine Prieto, Carl Rackemann, Miroslav Radović, Perrey Reeves, Clayton Richard, Kieran Richardson, Robinho, Lorena Rojas, Gianni Romme, Shayna Rose, Michal Rosíval, Daphné Roulier, Natalya Rudova, Calli Ryals, Beren Saat, Omar Sachedina, Koki Sakamoto, Pete Sampras, Leo Sayer, Byron Schammer, Nev Schulman, Seungri, Shaan, Gary Shaw (footballer), Suzanne Shaw, Skyler Shaye, Tuuli Shipster, Juan Manuel Silva, Jeroen Simaeys, Ashlee Simpson, Bob Simpson (cricketer), Rex Smith, Seth Smith, Nicky Southall, Yan Stastny, Reeva Steenkamp, Ryan Stout, Charlotte Sullivan, Tammin Sursok, Hiroki Suzuki, Warwick Taylor, Gaston Therrien, Jay Thomas, Michael Tilson Thomas, John Toland (historian), Joey Travolta, Michael Turnbull (bishop), Meryem Uzerli, Lien Van de Kelder, Peter Vanderkaay, Astrid Veillon, Paul Walker, Amanda Walsh, Gillian Iliana Waters, Brooke Williams, Sofía Zámolo

[Program 65 large breasts] Rachel Adegeye, Alexandra Adi, Isabelle Adriani, Alaska (singer), Natacha Amal, Marie Amihere, Indira Aradinović, Melissa Archer, Lauren Ash, Larissa Aurora, Tyra Banks, Saira Banu, Elizabeth Barker, Baroness Barker, Fantasia Barrino, Julia Benson, Traci Bingham, Lyn Brown, Ellana Bryan, Dara Bubamara, Petra Buzkova, Colleen Camp, Carla Campbell, Olivia Campbell (model), Rosaria Cannavò, Karla Casos, Marina Giulia Cavalli, Ceca (singer), Nives Celzijus, Carol Cleveland, Natalie Cohen, Gemma Collins, Chantelle Connelly, Molly Constable, Rita Cosby, Caylee Cowan, Laura Crosby, Maria Grazia Cucinotta, Wendy Davis (actress), Rebekah Del Rio, Natalia Domestico, Antonia Dorian, Olivia Taylor Dudley, Lindsey Duke, Debbe Dunning, Divya Dutta, Natalia Estrada, Diana Falzone, Lindsay Felton, Claudia Fernández, Chloe Ferry, Katarzyna Figura, Marika Fingerroos, Ava Fiore, Jodie Fisher, Meddy Ford, Francine Fournier, Chiara Francini, Brianna Francisco, Kate Garraway, Alex Gervasi, Julia Giles, Gina Grad, Maribel Guardia, Meghan Hardin, Lorali Hart, Kali Hawk, Imogen Hassall, Chelsee Healey, Briga Heelan, Ines Helene, Taeler Hendrix, Robyn Hilton, Peace Hyde, Roxana Ionescu, Shar Jackson, Melinda Johansson, Kym Johnson, Mercy Johnson, LaKisha Jones, Toccara Jones, Sophie Julia, Lena Katina, Vanessa Kay (dancer), Carrie Keagan, Reem Kherici, Christina Kim, Jessica Kresa, Carole Landis, Joi Lansing, Amber Dawn Lee, Valerie Leon, Li Meng Tian, Apollonia Llewellyn, Elita Loresca, Ellie Lou, Déborah Lukumuena, Love Majewski, Kerly Masko, Christina Mendez, Eve Meyer, Chrisette Michele, Ara Mina, Nicki Minaj, Hannah Minx, Tyler-Jane Mitchel, Jessica Monaco (model), Penny Mordaunt, Samantha Morton, Caroline Munro, Isabelle Nanty, Jessica Nigri, Linda Nolan, Chandra North, J. J. North, Oh In-hye, Yvonne Okoro, Ginna Pedros, Irina Pegova, Keren Peles, CeCe Peniston, Patricia Perez (presenter), Angela Pitts, Kelly Price, PrincessJazzCosplay, Ruslana Pysanka, Molly Qerim, Ivy Queen, Sandra Ramirez (actress), Helene Rask, Kiran Rathod, Larissa Riquelme, Morganna Roberts, Mimi Rogers, Yvonne Romain, Pamela Rooke, Irina Rozanova, Jane Russell, Elena Russo, Helena Růžičková, Jeri Ryan, Sanghavi, Camila Sant’Ana, Susan Sarandon, Barbara Schöneberger, Patricia Schumann, Karley Sciortino, Anna Semenovich, Kashmira Shah, Myriam Shehab, Sherri Shepherd, Rebecca Shiner, Kat Shoob, Annie Social, Danielle Souza, Octavia Spencer, Patti Stanger, Ainett Stephens, Leysi Suárez, Swarnamalya, Catherine Tate, Jana Thompson, Rania Toumi, Davorka Tovilo, Sonny Turner, Leeann Tweeden, Carol Wayne, Ela Weber, Kaitlan Welton, Valerie Wilson Wesley, Porsha Williams, Wendy Windham, Saaphyri Windsor, Diane Youdale

[Program 67 line in cheek] Efi Arazi, Emil Artin, Paul Attanasio, Pierre Victor Auger, Soheil Ayari, DeFord Bailey, Carl Barks, Bob Barr, Fred Beckey, Adriana Behar, Algernon Blackwood, Romane Bohringer, Michel Boisrond, Christian Bordeleau, Mark Brydon, John Cage, Eddie Cahill, Archie Carr, John Carradine, Nick Cassavetes, Trevor Cherry, Albert Claude, Edgar F. Codd, Mel Collins, Stephen Collins, Gary Cooper, Jared Crouch, W. Edwards Deming, Fabrizio Donato, Billy Drago, Marcel Duchamp, Karen Dunbar, Jean Echenoz, Habib Elghanian, Helene Fischer, Michael Ford, Freddie Garrity, Jaime Garzón, Cecilia Gasdia, Alice Ghostley, Osvaldo Golijov, Christopher Gorham, Charles Guggenheim, Jackée Harry, Sean Hill (hockey player), Larry Hovis, Billy Ibadulla, Brian Johnson, John Kapelos, Boris Karloff, Jim Kelly, Marc Kennedy, Liv Kristine, Firmin Lambot, Tom Laughlin, Hugh Laurie, John Le Mesurier, Charles Philippe Leblond, Erica Leerhsen, Tanya Justine Lehman, Nils Liedholm, Eric Lindros, George Lopez, Jack Marshall (politician), Harpo Marx, Herminio Masantonio, Richard Levis McCormick, Willie McGinest, Mike McPhee, Filip Meirhaeghe, Bruce Nash, Davidson Nicol, Chris Parnell, Vicente Ferreira Pastinha, Dougie Payne, Wim Polak, Kelly Preston, Georges Prêtre, Andrew Prine, James Rebhorn, Johnny Revolta, Luke Ricketson, Fred Roberts, Alex Rocco, Sakis Rouvas, Joseph Ruskin, İlyas Salman, Sabine Schmitz, Vic Seixas, Eric Sevareid, Ted Shackelford, John Shea, Al Shearer, Rachel Skarsten, François Sterchele, Howard Stern, Frank Stranahan, David Strathairn, Ai Sugiyama, Yves Tanguy, Dan Toler, Rick Vaive, Kristof Vandewalle, Patricia Velásquez, Valentina Vezzali, Laurence Vichnievsky, George Voinovich, Rusty Wallace, Jimmy Wayne, Betty White, Geoffrey Wilkinson, John Wooden, Rico Yan, Nora Zehetner

[Program 73 large jaws] Willie Adler, Kolawole Agodirin, Angelica Agurbash, Marco Amelia, Susie Amy, Stephan Andersen, Billie Joe Armstrong, Anabela Atijas, Nicole Coco Austin, Bianca Balti, Sergio Basañez, Hervé Bazin, Jason Behr, Kirsten Belin, Andrea Benatti, Amber Benson, Viva Bianca, Daniel Booko, Carlton Brewster, Matteo Brighi, Shane Brolly, Kateřina Cachová, Belinda Carlisle, Kelly Carlson, Helena Bonham Carter, Edward A. Carter, Jr., Lorenzo Cittadini, Kim Cloutier, Enrico Colantoni, Danielle Cormack, Stephanie Courtney (grey), Michela Rocco di Torrepadula, Charles Divins, Crystal Driggers, Anne-Marie Duff, Sapphire Elia, Christine Elise, Kaj-Erik Eriksen, Jennifer Esposito, Warren Feeney, David Ferrer, Kirk Franklin, Marco Fu, Susumu Fujita, Brett Gardner, Gennaro Gattuso, Mariya Gorban, Dorian Gregory, Hélène Grémillon, Myron Grimshaw, Krishnan Guru-Murthy, Linda Hamilton, Jason Hanson, Mark Harper, Hayley Hasselhoff, Gertrude Himmelfarb, Ashton Holmes, Markéta Hrubešová, Saeed Jaffrey, Cory Jane, Chantal Janzen, Nate Kaeding, Vernon Kay, Layla Kayleigh, Lisa Kelly, Rick Kelly, Doris Kemptner, Alison King, Keira Knightley, Ali Larter, Kian Lawley, Irina Lăzăreanu, Reichen Lehmkuhl, Anne-Élisabeth Lemoine, Oleg Lisogor, Brian Littrell, Nadia Litz, Anna Madeley, Peter Madsen, Maïwenn, Gary Majewski, April Matson, Monet Mazur, Danica McKellar, Tammy Faye Messner, Aaron Michael Metchik, Tracy Middendorf, Mirah, Susan Misner, Mike Mizanin, Joshua Morrow, Adrian Mutu, Dylan Neal, Najwa Nimri, Kseniya Novikova, Jerry O’Connell, Hanne Gaby Odiele, Colton Orr, Gilles Pagnon, Rosie Perez, Beth Phoenix, Emma Pierson, Dave Pope (baseball player), Dominic Purcelli, Micaela Ramazzotti, Ernie Reyes, Jr., Rachel Reynolds, Beatriz Rico, Emma Rigby, Jeremiah Riggs, Greg Rikaart, Sam Riley, Don Robinson (baseball player), Adam Rodríguez, Preacher Roe, Jeremy Roenick, Pernille Rosendahl, Lauren Sanchez, Maria Sansone, Gabrielle Scharnitzky, Martina Schild, Jason Schwartzman, Scott Severin, Sam Shaw (wrestler), Gordon Shedden, Anton Shunin, Luis Fernando Silva, Elena Sokolova, Ana Srebrnič, Dimitri Szarzewski, Courtney Thorne-Smith, Abi Titmuss, Paul Triquet, Vanessa-Mae, Dwayne Wade, Leon Wagner, Nikki Warner, Sigourney Weaver, Charley Webb, Tom Welling, Jana Wendt, Betty White, Gabriella Wilde, Olivia Wilde, Craig Wing, Tiffani Wood, Mark Worrell, Robin Wright, Lisa Zane, Nick Zano, Zhou Bichang, Karim Ziani

The people on these lists share epigenetic programs. They are not related.

Article 6 has a hundred and eighty four excerpts from six peer-reviewed scientific articles, five science news articles, and twenty Wikipedia articles. These excerpts give anyone who reads them an understanding of everything we currently know about genetics and epigenetics. There is a two page essay following the excerpts which addresses many of the main points brought up in them. For example, we know many of the mechanisms involved in regulating gene expression, but we don’t know how epigenetic signals start off; we know genes interact with each other and form genetic interaction networks but we have no idea how they form; we know something controls gene-gene interaction but we don’t know what controls it; and we don’t believe any methodological breakthroughs are going to happen that will lead us to discovering how epigenetic signals start off, what causes genetic interaction networks to form, or what controls gene-gene interaction. I explain that another genetic architect does all of this and that it does its work at specific times. I explain how it does its work, and when, in Article 7.

Article 7 has a hundred and thirty excerpts from two peer-reviewed scientific articles, ten science articles, and eighteen Wikipedia articles. These excerpts give anyone who reads them a basic idea of what the Other Architect is and a basic idea of how it does its work. The excerpts are followed by a four page essay which explains the Other Architect and how it regulates gene expression, as well as one of the times that it does so. We already know that DNA gets programmed during the preimplantation period (about five days after fertilization of the egg). We know that this programming determines whether or not we develop genetic problems later in life. We know that nutritional factors play a part and that heredity plays a part, but most of the process is a mystery. The essay explains everything else involved in the genetic programming that occurs during preimplantation. It explains what makes the Other Architect something distinct from the process we have assumed is the only genetic architect for the last hundred years. It also discusses how this knowledge will change our understanding of life.

Article 8 has a hundred and eighty one excerpts from nine peer-reviewed scientific articles, fourteen science articles, two science news articles, and twenty two Wikipedia articles. These excerpts go more into detail about the Other Architect than the excerpts in Article 7; they give a history of the Other Architect; and they share experiments done by scientists in which they were studying the Other Architect without knowing it – as well as their findings. The excerpts are followed by a five page essay which discusses another time that the Other Architect programs DNA. It also proposes experiments that need to be done in order to fully understand, and document, the effects of the Other Architect on life. It explains what we’ll be able to do once we’ve done these experiments.

In 2020, I wrote another article. This article has a hundred and six excerpts from sixteen peer-reviewed scientific articles, three science news articles, and two Wikipedia articles. These excerpts contain even more findings on the mechanisms of gene regulation and share more information about epigenetic programming. The excerpts are followed by a three page essay which explains how knowledge of the Other Architect could prevent future pandemics and how it could have prevented the current one. By understanding how genetic programming works, we can stop the programming that causes us to have genetic issues later in life. The majority of the people who died in 2020 and 2021 had genetic issues that came from their epigenetic programming. By preventing the epigenetic programming that leads to genetic issues, people will no longer be as vulnerable as they are now to the effects of viruses and bacteria. Preventing the epigenetic programming that leads to genetic issues is safer than gene editing (slicing DNA open) because gene editing causes mutations whereas preventing harmful programming does not. It is also less expensive and less invasive. The scientific community knows that gene editing is expensive and that it causes mutations. That’s why no one suggested we use gene editing to stop the deaths that were being caused, and are still being caused, by coronavirus.

The reason I wrote the first eight articles in 2018 is because I realized what I had discovered was something huge and, because it takes people time to accept and to understand anything new, I had to share it as soon as possible. It could’ve been possible for me to share the articles in 2018, to have done all the experiments needed to verify everything in the articles before 2020, and to have begun the work that would lead to us being able to prevent genetic issues and disorders before the pandemic started. The reason this didn’t happen is because sharing information and finding people requires time. No one who can help take what I’ve discovered to the next level will know about my work until I have a team of people helping me to share it. For something great to happen, several great people have to get together to make it happen. It isn’t possible for one person to do everything. I didn’t make the major discovery (another genetic architect) until after doing tens of thousands of hours of research. My experience trying to share it has been exactly the same as Charles Darwin’s when he first tried to share his big discovery. No one wants to hear about it. To make people want to hear about it by myself is going to take as much time and effort as it took to discover it. Every day that people don’t know about it is another day that the work that will prevent genetic problems is delayed. If 60% of people have some kind of genetic issue and close to 400,000 people are born every day, then around 240,000 more people are denied the benefits that will come from my work every day that passes. That’s over a million people a week.

If you google “percentage of people with mental problems,” you’ll see that according to different sources, between 20%-25% of Americans experience mental illness in any given year. If you google “economic cost of mental problems,” you’ll see that mental illness will cost the world 16 trillion dollars by 2030. People with mental illness are suffering, and many of them cause others to suffer. I’ve encountered mentally ill people in my life who have caused problems for me. I’ve encountered mentally ill people who caused problems for other people. If you google “mental health statistics 2021,” you’ll see that it is estimated that 970 million people have a mental health or substance abuse disorder. If you google “percent of people with personality disorders,” you’ll see that it is estimated that between 10%-13% of the world’s population suffer from personality disorders. That’s another 800 million people – over 70 million of them being sociopaths. You’ve also encountered mentally ill people who caused problems for you and you’ve also encountered mentally ill people who caused problems for others. The ways we currently deal with people with mental health issues is ineffective and costly (hundreds of billions of dollars a year). We want to help the people we know who have mental health problems, but we can’t. There are medications that help with certain problems, but either help to a limited degree or have unwanted side effects. Helping people with personality disorders is where we’re the least successful – especially sociopaths.

The reason we’re so unsuccessful at helping people with mental health problems is that our collective knowledge about life is incomplete. We’re taught there is only one genetic architect, so we try to place everything we encounter in life, and about life, in line with what we know about this architect – even though most of what happens doesn’t fit. Until people know about what I discovered in 2017, we’ll have problems helping people with mental health problems. Whenever I mention to people that I discovered something that can help people with mental health problems, they have the same response. The response is that the pharmaceutical industry won’t let that happen because it profits from mental illness. People I talk to believe the American healthcare system is corrupt and dysfunctional. They believe its purpose is to profit off of people’s sickness instead of curing it. Anyone who poses a threat to the money they’re making off of us will be silenced through negative propaganda, threats of violence, or actual violence. If this is even partially true, it means I need to find people who can help me to share my work in a way that won’t provoke any of these responses. The people who can figure out how to do that and who have the ability to do it are the people I need to find. If shared in the correct way, this discovery could be the thing that completely transforms the current healthcare system from one that is dysfunctional and ineffective to one which actually cures and prevents health problems. A group of intelligent, uncorrupted people could make this happen.

The three areas of genetic programming that I have focused on are the programs that lead to neuropsychiatric disorders (which are also the ones that lead to gastrointestinal disorders), the ones that lead to endocrine system problems, and the ones that lead to cancer. I know the non-nutritional factors that cause all of these programs. To pinpoint all of the exact causes would require a small group of people to do experiments. To pay these people and to get all the equipment they would need would cost less than a million dollars, and the experiments would take less than a year. Afterwards, I would be in a position to begin work on what would prevent the programs which cause us to develop neuropsychiatric problems, gastrointestinal problems, endocrine system problems, and cancer. That work would take a year or two to complete, would require a small team, and would also cost less than a million dollars. Someone who is really good at raising money could get the money necessary in just a couple of months, which would mean that we would have all the non-nutritional factors involved in the programs of several genetic issues pinpointed before the end of 2022. It would also mean that we would have the ability to prevent these genetic issues before the end of 2024.

Another area of genetic programming that I can focus on is the programs that lead to heart disease and heart problems. Heart disease is one of the three genetic issues considered to have reached epidemic proportions. Obesity, which is an endocrine system problem, and cancer are the other two. If you google “total amount of money put into cancer research,” you’ll see that in 2015 the amount of money reached $100 billion and that we spend billions each year trying to find a cure. If you google “healthcare costs of cancer,” you’ll see that the cost of treating cancer is tens of billions of dollars a year. If you google “cancer research in Europe,” you’ll see that Europe is spending billions of Euros trying to find a cure. If you google “total amount of money put into obesity research,” you’ll see that the estimated annual healthcare costs of obesity-related illness is over $190 billion a year (you won’t find the amount put into researching obesity). If you google “total amount of money put into heart disease research,” you’ll see that it’s over $2 billion a year to treat and that it causes over $100 billion in lost productivity every year. We’ve spent billions of dollars trying to cure these genetic issues, we’ve spent billions treating them, and we’ve lost billions because of them. That’s just the economic cost. There’s also a social cost. The people lost to these diseases are our parents, our children, our husbands, our wives, our friends.

Once the causes of the programs which lead to these genetic issues are pinpointed, we will finally be in a position to do something about it. For 0.015% of the amount of money put into cancer and heart disease research in the United States every year, a small team of people could change all of this in just two or three years. The reason no one has found any cures is because all of our knowledge is knowledge of one genetic architect. In other words, we collectively know too little about life. After dozens of years and hundreds of billions of dollars trying to find cures, we should have realized that maybe we don’t know as much about how life works as we thought we did. All the money should have gone to finding out what we don’t know about life. Everything we learn that we didn’t know before takes us one step closer to being able to cure cancer and heart disease. Funding needs to go to people who have discovered something. Anyone who has made a discovery can make more if they have the funding.

The people who are going to be part of sharing the discovery of the Other Architect are people who aren’t part of the dysfunctional ways that people are currently doing things. The way we’re looking for cures doesn’t work and it never will. Giving billions of dollars to people who think they already know everything about life will never lead to any cures. If you can understand that, you might be someone who can help me share what I’ve discovered. Most people are going to refuse to believe it is even possible for anyone to make a discovery. Part of the reason I made the discovery is that I avoided all the dysfunctional ways our society does things and I avoided all the dysfunctional ways we’re taught to think. I need a team of people who are also free from dysfunctional thinking and who aren’t caught up in dysfunctional ways of doing things to help me share what I discovered. It isn’t going to be easy and I can’t do it alone. Everyone who has fallen for everything dysfunctional is going to do everything they can to stop what they’re going to be unable to understand and appreciate. The more people who are free from dysfunctional thinking and dysfunctional ways of doing things that work with me, the sooner the experiments that need to be done will be done. This means the more non-dysfunctional people who work with me, the sooner we’ll finally be able to do something about obesity, heart disease, and cancer.

What I’m going to share is something that everyone in a hundred years is going to think is common sense but which very few people right now are going to be willing to comprehend. This is what happens every time someone discovers something and tries to share it. The reason I am not explicitly saying what all my discoveries are is because people who are lost in dysfunctional thinking and dysfunctional ways of doing things will misuse what I’ve discovered. The only people who won’t misuse a discovery are people who haven’t been corrupted by dysfunctional thinking. I need uncorrupted people to help me to share everything in a way in which it can’t be misused. The people I need on my team are people who are incorruptible, who don’t want to be a part of dysfunctional thinking, and who see the value of what I’m working on. You have to want to be part of something great and you have to be able to be part of something great. People corrupted by dysfunctional thinking can’t be part of anything great. To believe in anything dysfunctional makes you part of everything dysfunctional. We’re going to share something great with people (a discovery) and we’re going to help people to do something great which is going to improve the quality of life for everyone. We’re also going to help people to stop being dysfunctional. If you read about personality disorders, which between 10%-13% of all people in the whole world have, you’ll see that they make people dysfunctional. There are currently no cures for paranoid, schizoid, schizotypal, antisocial, borderline, histrionic, narcissistic, avoidant, dependent, or obsessive-compulsive personality disorder and treatments don’t really work. By stopping the genetic programs that cause people to have these disorders, we’ll finally be able to prevent personality disorders, as well as neuropsychiatric disorders. According to Wikipedia’s list of mental disorders, there are about 200 known mental disorders. There are eating disorders, phobias, anxiety disorders, mood disorders, dementia, sexual disorders (like pedophilia), and many others. If I find non-dysfunctional people to work with, we can prevent these. If my work gets into the hands of dysfunctional people, they’ll use it for something dysfunctional instead.

Another reason I wrote the first eight articles about what I discovered is that the United States is planning on sending people to live on Mars. It’s obvious we don’t know everything about life. We don’t know enough about life to cure or prevent any of the genetic disorders that are considered global epidemics. We don’t know enough about life to cure or prevent any of the mental disorders that we suffer from. How is it possible that we know enough about life to live on another planet? It isn’t possible. The only way it will be possible is for people to become familiar with what I’ve discovered. Once we fully understand the other genetic architect, we’ll have a much more complete understanding of how life works. Once our understanding of life is closer to complete, then we’ll be in a position to do something like live on another planet. I have to share this now because the work that still has to be done will take years. I need to find non-dysfunctional people to help me do the work that remains to be done and to help me share everything I’ve already found in a way that none of the dysfunctional people can hinder or prevent. Finding non-dysfunctional people could take years. I can’t send my discoveries to any institutions because they have all been squandering billions of dollars for decades in the belief that they know enough about life to cure disease. The people in these institutions also think they know enough about life to send people to live on another planet. In other words, institutions are run by, and made up of, people who believe they know more than they actually know. It is impossible to even communicate with people like that. They wouldn’t appreciate what I sent them, or they would destroy it because it would be seen as a threat to their agendas (or they would misuse it to help them with their agendas). I have to find non-dysfunctional people who are sane enough to understand that they don’t already know everything there is to know and who don’t have the agendas that people who have been corrupted have. It’s very important that I work with incorruptible people because there are going to be endless attempts to corrupt everyone I work with. Finding incorruptible non-dysfunctional people is the part of sharing my work that is going to take the most time. This means that I have to start now.

I need to make it clear what I mean by corrupted and incorruptible. You don’t need to be in a position of power to be corrupted. It isn’t just money that corrupts people. Thinking you already know everything there is to know is a form of corruption. There are countless people who think they know everything about someone just by looking at them. They see things in terms of race and ethnicity. They usually don’t even bother to confirm the race or ethnicity of the people they believe they know everything about. That is just one of the many ways this form of corruption plays out. Believing that dishonesty is intelligence is another form of corruption, and it goes much deeper than telling lies. Three good Wikipedia articles on dishonesty are “Bad faith (existentialism),” “Ressentiment,” and “True self and false self”. These articles discuss how dishonesty corrupts people. Another form of corruption is the belief that you are better than everyone else. Usually, people who have been corrupted in this way have a sense of entitlement. They believe people are inferior because of certain behaviors, yet they themselves can behave in the same way. They justify this in the same way everyone justifies the same behavior – entitlement. Thinking that selfish goals are important is another form of corruption. There are so many things we need to do in this world that being shallow and selfish doesn’t even make sense anymore. Wanting to control other people is another form of corruption. Thinking that hatred towards some group of people will solve, rather than perpetuate, problems is another form of corruption. It divides people and prevents them from uniting and solving their problems. Believing that viciousness is strength is another way many people get corrupted. These corrupted people believe that doing whatever is necessary to get the upper hand, regardless of how underhanded, vicious, or intellectually dishonest, it is makes them strong. They usually engage in this behavior when there aren’t any witnesses. If someone walks in while they’re in the middle of it, or if they think someone might be recording them, they completely change their attitude, which shows that they know exactly what they’re doing.

There are many reasons why people fall for these forms of corruption. It’s usually that there seems to be a reward and the price of the corruption does not seem to be anything substantial. If the ways all of these things corrupt people isn’t obvious to you, you aren’t incorruptible. If you believe all people are corrupt, you’re not incorruptible. If you spend your time listening to corrupt people telling you what to think, you’re not incorruptible. If you look up to people you’re told to look up to, you’re not incorruptible. If you subscribe to any ideologies, you’re not incorruptible. If you’re ruled by fear or selfishness, you’re not incorruptible. In fact, the two main things that corrupt people are fear and selfishness. The more free you are from them, the less corruptible you are. The more you are ruled by them, the more corrupt you become. Some people are completely ruled by them. Some people are completely free. Most people are somewhere in between. The people who will make the projects of furthering the work I’ve done and of sharing it are the people who are completely free.

People who haven’t been corrupted tend to spend their time doing things that corrupted people don’t do. They socialize with people without having ulterior motives. They solve problems that the people around them ignore. They speak sincerely. They pay attention to what people are saying. They think of other people even when those people aren’t around. The things that corrupt everyone else don’t have the same effect on them. They see the effects of corruption and know it’s something worth avoiding. Corruption not only prevents problems from being solved, it’s also one of the worst problems. Each person who isn’t corrupt is looking for other people who aren’t corrupt. They’re all looking for something great to work on. Most of them never find any other people who aren’t corrupt. Some of them find something great to work on. Some of them don’t. Sharing the discovery of the Other Architect is the project that the people who aren’t corrupt are looking for. It’s a chance for them to meet, and work with, other people who aren’t corrupt. It’s a chance for great people to do something great with other great people. It’s a chance for them to be a part of something worthy of them and their abilities. All the different skills they have will help this great project succeed. It can’t succeed without them.

This discovery is on the history-making level. Anyone who participates in the research and experiments that are going to be done in the next couple of years are going to be a part of history. Anyone who helps to share what I’ve already discovered, and what the people I work with are going to discover, are going to be a part of history as well. Their names are going to be associated with all of the other people who kept free from corruption and who did something great. Their names are going to be associated with the survival of the people that are going to Mars. Their names are going to be associated with humanity’s success in preventing genetic issues. Their names are going to be associated with the discovery of another genetic architect. The people who helped Darwin to share his work are as much a part of history as Darwin himself. He couldn’t have succeeded without them. The people who were opposed to his discoveries were people who had been corrupted in some of the ways I spoke about. It’s going to be more difficult to share this discovery than it was for Darwin to share his because there are more people that have been corrupted and the ways in which corrupted people can achieve their aims are more numerous and more effective. The people who become a part of this project are all going to deserve to be a part of history because they’re going to have to overcome all the dysfunctional thinking of the most dysfunctional society in history. They’re going to have to be some of the bravest, most intelligent, and least corruptible people who have ever lived.

The fact that this discovery is going to be a part of history means that there are going to be biographies written about everyone involved. There will probably be a documentary or two. Eventually, there will be a movie. I haven’t spoken about myself because I want to be anonymous as long as possible. People will be interested in me, and in the people I work with, after the discovery is shared. Once a documentary is made or a biography is written, people will find out who I am. The people I work with will find out who I am when they meet me. It doesn’t matter if I am male or female. It doesn’t matter what continent my ancestors are from. The details of my life don’t matter. What matters is the discovery I’ve made and the discoveries the team I’m going to work with are going to make. Until we’ve reached the point where it’s all ready to share with people, any kind of media involvement in the project is only going to detract from it. My life is interesting and I have made accomplishments in a couple of different fields, but none of that matters – especially right now. Once we share all of the discoveries, we can then share all the interesting things about us and all the interesting things about the project itself.

If you google “epigenetic programming,” you’ll find several peer-reviewed scientific articles which state that epigenetic programming is a major factor in determining whether someone develops genetic disorders later in life. Many of these articles state that adverse events, such as malnutrition and stress, lead to epigenetic changes which can lead to genetic issues such as diabetes, mood disorders, neurodegenerative disorders, and cardiovascular disease. Some of the articles state that the epigenetic modifications are potentially reversible (while others state that they are irreversible). The mechanisms responsible for epigenetic programming are said to be unclear. Several articles also state that there is a sensitive “window” for epigenetic programming. The most commonly suggested way of reversing epigenetic programming is lifestyle change, and there is evidence that changing your diet does reverse some of the negative epigenetic programs. If you google “epigenetic profiles,” you’ll also find an article about how exposure to heavy metals during the “windows” of sensitivity is associated with genetic issues later in life.

The reason they can’t find the underlying mechanisms of epigenetic programming, and can only find the programs caused by malnutrition, stress, and heavy metals, is that they have no clue where to look. They’re only looking in the most obvious places. I discovered the underlying mechanisms in 2017. They are responsible for all the programs which no one can find causes for. Studying the programs themselves, you’ll find that there are a set number of them. Each genetic issue is part of a spectrum. Each program has its own spectrum, but parts of that spectrum intersect with the spectra of other programs. Each genetic disorder can be found in several programs because the spectrum of disorders found in those programs intersect. Each spectrum comes into existence the moment the program comes into existence and is caused by an epigenetic event. Some programs are not as common as others. These programs have spectra which contain rare genetic disorders. Some spectra intersections also occur rarely and are the locations where rare disorders are to be found. Some programs are more common than others.

No one has a single epigenetic program. Most people have between seven and nine. The more programs you have with spectra that contain specific genetic disorders, the higher your chances are of developing that genetic disorder. Many people develop several disorders from a single spectrum. For example, there are people with metabolic disorder, diabetes, hypothyroidism, and polycystic ovary syndrome all at once. There are people who have several psychological disorders at the same time. There are also people who have several types of cancer at the same time. Many programs have spectra with all the different forms of cancer. The more of these programs your DNA has, the higher your chances of getting cancer and the more forms it is possible for that cancer to take.

Knowing what causes the programs means the spectra of disorders and diseases are all preventable. Each spectra is caused by a specific event. If a disease or disorder is on five spectra, stopping the events which cause the five programs with those spectra would prevent that disease or disorder from occurring. If we wanted to, we could stop the events which cause every program with genetic disorder spectra. It would be like vaccines, except for genetic issues. If we really wanted to, we could make genetic disorders and diseases a thing of the past before any of us is ten years older. The programs with disease spectra are variations of programs which don’t have those kinds of spectra. Because there are a set number of programs, it is possible to catalog each one. The cause of each one and all of the genetic effects it has can be catalogued. We can have genetic disorders completely understood in less than ten years. We can also have most physical traits completely understood in less than ten years.

Physical traits are also on spectra. What isn’t obviously inherited, and what no one has been able to explain, about our physical traits owes its existence to epigenetic programs. Some traits have obvious relations to the spectra talked about earlier. For example, many really tall people have hyperthyroidism which is a disorder on all the spectra with endocrine system disorders. Many women with really large breasts have macromastia which is also on the same spectra. Mouth shapes, eyebrow shapes, and nose shapes have spectra. Skin undertones and hair undertones do as well. Many epigenetic programs have really interesting effects on the way people’s eyes (irises) look.

People who already have, whose DNA is already expressing, a genetic disorder can have the program/s causing them to have the disorder reversed. During the “windows” where major epigenetic programming occurs, all epigenetic markers are erased and a set of completely new ones replaces them. “Windows” can be re-created (re-opened) and the old program replaced with a new one. With a precise knowledge of all the program-causing events, we can give DNA any programs we want. We can also prevent any programs that we don’t want. Figuring out all the details of the process is going to take years of work. Cataloguing all the epigenetic programs, their genetic effects, and the events which cause them is also going to take years of work.

The first year we work together, we’re going to do scientific experiments. If someone who works with me is a geneticist, we won’t have to find anyone to do the experiments. Whoever does the experiments is going to get standard pay. For geneticists that’s $50 an hour. We also need some special equipment – equipment that is not found in any genetics labs. With special equipment costs and our geneticist’s salary, the first year that we work together we’re going to need around $200,000. Once we’ve done all the experiments that need to be done, we can share our findings and begin work on the biomedical technologies that will prevent genetic disorders. This phase of our project could take anywhere from a year to two years. To design these technologies and to build prototypes will cost from $100,000 to $200,000. Funding the second phase will be easy. After sharing our findings, there will be so much interest in what we’re doing that we won’t have any problems finding people who want to get involved. We can get some of our funding by selling NFTs. My original articles can be made into NFTs. All the discoveries I made that led me to make the huge discovery in 2017 can be made into NFTs. All the videos I’ve made about my discoveries can also be made into NFTs. We could also do crowdfunding. We could apply for grants. If one of the people who joins my team is an artist, they could probably fund the first two phases of the project by selling just a few NFTs (and we could fund the rest of the project with my science NFTs).

I’m aware that there are several online articles saying that NFTs are harmful to the environment because each NFT transaction uses a huge amount of electricity. The big blockchains use as much electricity as whole countries and only 60%-70% of that electricity comes from renewable energy sources. This means they’re contributing to the pollution of the environment. If our team sells a few NFTs, it won’t be a huge part of that pollution. If our NFTs get resold a hundred times each, it will use as much energy as the average household uses in four years. The actual amount of times our NFTs get resold will probably be closer to ten times each (or less), which means they will use up as much energy as the average household does in five months. What we’re doing with that energy would make selling the NFTs worth it. Work is currently being done on making blockchains less energy-consuming. If this work is successful, it will mean that we’ll be using even less energy. By the time we’re on the second phase of our project, the percentage of electricity blockchains use that comes from renewable energy sources will probably be considerably higher. To do the experiments is also going to use high amounts of energy. We can do the experiments at a location where all electricity comes from renewable energy sources.

There are more aspects to this project than science and fund-raising. Anyone who is non-dysfunctional and incorruptible who wants to be part of it will be able to contribute to the project in some way. Any kind of skill or knowledge you have will help. If you don’t have any skill that will help this project to succeed, other people on our team can teach you what they know. If you’re creative in any way or if you’re a good communicator, you’re someone who can help us to achieve all our goals and objectives. If you’re good at finding things or figuring things out, if you see things that other people overlook, if you refuse to give up on something even after everyone else has, you’re someone we want on our team. If you want to help reduce the amount of mental illness in the world, this project is what you’ve been looking for. If you want to help people to stop being dysfunctional, this is the project you’ve been looking for. If you want the colonies on Mars to be successful, this is the project you’ve been looking for. If you want to help stop people dying from heart disease and from cancer, this is you project you’ve been looking for. You can help this project to succeed. No other project in the world has any chance of succeeding in any of the areas I just mentioned. If you’re a great human being looking for something great to be a part of, there’s really nothing better suited for you than this project. It’s also an opportunity for you to meet other great people. This project, and the people that are going to be part of it, is what you’ve been looking for your entire life. The friendships you’re going to make are the ones you’ve been looking for your entire life. You’re not only going to love the work you’re going to do and everything that comes from it, you’re also going to love all the people you’re going to be working with.

The sooner we all start meeting each other, the better. There are many things we need to discuss and there are many conversations we need to have. Good discussions and conversations help things to happen that wouldn’t happen until much later. Without the ideas and information that get exchanged during good discussions and conversations, people are unable to do many things. What you’re reading is the beginning of a conversation. It’s missing several ideas because those ideas are the ones you’re going to contribute. It lacks certain pieces of information because you’re the one who has those pieces of information. We have to get to know each other. You already know things about me. You know that I made a discovery. You know that I’m looking for people to help me to share what I’ve discovered in the way it needs to be shared. You know what kind of people need to be a part of the project of sharing the discovery. Now you need to tell me about yourself. You need to tell me who you are. You need to tell me what part you want to play in the project. You need to tell me and the other people we’re going to be working with the things you know that we don’t know. You need to share ideas with all of us. I’ve gotten in touch with you by writing this. Now you have to get in touch with me. The easiest way would be to email me. My email address is newmechanisms@protonmail.com. Let me know that you’re contacting me because you know about the project I’ve been talking about and that you would like to be a part of it. Most of my first emails to you will be questions because I have to know who you are. It will take a while to get to know each other, but once we do we can start discussing things and having conversations, and I’ll introduce you to the other people who have contacted me.

Nobody foresaw this discovery. The internet was foreseen, and so were cell phones, by Nikola Tesla. He foresaw that people in the future were going to have devices that fit in their pocket which they could use to send each other messages and which would receive news from all over the world. He called it “the transmission of intelligence” and he believed it would lead to world peace. He didn’t foresee the existence of satellites. He thought the devices would work by using underground electrical currents. Strangely, no one picked up on it. No artists or science fiction writers incorporated his idea into their work. No one’s vision of the future included cell phones or the internet. From what I’ve seen and read about everything that people believe is going to exist in the future, no one has foreseen what I discovered in 2017 and no one has foreseen any of the technologies that are going to be made possible because of it. People are so convinced that there is only one genetic architect that everything they imagine is constrained by the belief. They think gene editing is the future, even though it can’t be the future because it causes mutations. Without understanding the Other Architect, all our attempts to alter DNA will lead to mutations. It doesn’t happen every single time, by the way, and it hasn’t happened every single time, but whether or not it does happen is, and has been, a matter of luck. Once we understand the Other Architect, we’ll be able to prevent genetic issues and we’ll be able to do gene editing without mutations.

No story set in the future ever mentions two genetic architects. The importance of the fact that there is more than one genetic architect isn’t limited to genetics or health. There are other areas in which our knowledge of the Other Architect is going to have profound effects and no one has foreseen any of its effects in any of these areas either. A few groups of scientists have done experiments that could have led them to discover what I discovered, but they didn’t see the importance of their experiments, which means they couldn’t see any reason to continue with the kind of experiments they were doing. The original articles that I wrote in 2018 have excerpts from all of their papers. Their belief that there is only one genetic architect stopped them from making the discovery they could have made. Doing scientific experiments with preconceptions and beliefs isn’t the way scientists in the past did their work. It’s not even really science. Science is activity that is free from beliefs and preconceptions. It’s an attempt to try to understand something. When you think you already know everything, it’s impossible for you to be a scientist. None of the scientists of the past that people look up to today believed they already knew everything. They weren’t full of preconceptions and they weren’t trying to further any agendas, either of their own or of anyone else. If they were, they wouldn’t have discovered anything.

The amount of time I’ve put into studying the Other Architect is over fifty thousand hours. I’ve read hundreds of articles and I’ve been doing field research for close to twenty years. While doing field research, I’ve made tens of thousands of discoveries, which are all evidence that another genetic architect exists. All of this evidence put together is hundreds of pages long and all of it can be verified by anyone. It doesn’t matter what country you’re from. It doesn’t matter how old you are (even a six year old could do it). It doesn’t matter if you are college-educated or not. All you need is internet access. If you’re in Europe, Australia, Antarctica, Canada, India, or the United States, you’ll be able to verify everything. In Africa, Central America, South America, and the majority of Asia, you’ll have a harder time finding some of the information. I never had any agendas or preconceptions while doing any of the field work. I continued doing it because I kept making interesting discoveries. I told myself I would stop when the discoveries stopped. I thought it would take a year or a year and a half. At the four-year point my science work was interrupted by something that happened to me. You’ll find out what this was later. When I recommenced doing science, I again thought it would only take a year or two. After eight years had passed since I began the whole thing, I started to realize that all the things I discovered had some kind of significance. I had no idea what their significance was, but I wanted to get other people involved. Finding people to get involved was difficult because everyone around me had their own personal projects and didn’t have time to give to anything else.

When my work reached the eleven-year point, I decided to try to find other people to get involved by using social media. I made a blog and put some of my findings on it. I also made two social media accounts. At that point I was still years away from making my big discovery. I thought people would be able to see the importance of what I already found. I thought that I would find people who would be willing to work with me and that one of us would figure out, or discover, what explained everything I had already found. I used my social media accounts to show people my blog. I spent an hour a day doing this, and I did it for over two years. Many of the people I contacted are famous and we had short social-media conversations. Most people I contacted did not interact with me. The blog was getting thousands of views, but nothing anyone said showed any indication that they really understood what was on it or that they wanted to be a part of what I was doing. I was someone who completely misunderstood social media. I thought it was a place to meet people who were interested in being part of something. It took a while to figure out that social media was more about promoting yourself, sharing opinions and details about your personal life, getting news, and being entertained. After two and a half years, I realized I was wasting my time. I deleted my blog and my social media accounts. I have screenshots of all the interactions I had with people, though. Once we share this discovery with everyone and there’s worldwide interest in me as a person, we can raise money for whatever we’re working on by turning these screenshots into NFTs – or we can put them all together and make one NFT. Because the accounts no longer exist, no one else in the world has, or can make, screenshots of these interactions.

I started using the time I was using on social media to do research on DNA instead. I looked up all the genes that we know about and all the genetic issues associated with them. Then I found all the people it was possible to find on the internet who had those genetic issues. I put everything I found together into one document. When I was done, the document was about the size of a book. The book has hundreds of pages about genes and it has hundreds of pages of lists of people who have the genetic issues associated with many of those genes. Anyone interested in genetics will find this book interesting. Because it helps to illustrate how the Other Architect affects DNA, its contents, some of them at least, will be used in textbooks later to teach people about the Other Architect. It is part of the discovery. We can make some changes to it and publish it later. We can make the original into an NFT. The copy I printed out for myself, which has notes handwritten by me all over it, can also be made into an NFT – or several NFTs. It has over eighty lists of genetic disorders and over seven thousand people who have the disorders.

After making the DNA book, I started looking into SNPs. At that time, there wasn’t as much information available as there is now. At the present moment, millions of SNPs have been identified and you can find information on over 111,000 of them using SNPedia. SNPs are associated with many physical phenotypes and many disease phenotypes. They’re also associated with complex traits like height and eye color. SNPs are point mutations. Point mutations occur during DNA replication, and they’re inheritable. When I was using SNPedia to learn about SNPs, there was only information available on 80,000 SNPs. I went through all 80,000 SNPs and organized them according to what phenotypes they were associated with. I put all the ones associated with cancer together, all the ones associated with psychological disorders, all the ones associated with eye color, all the ones associated with height, et cetera. This took me almost a year. SNPs are extremely interesting. There are SNPs associated with political beliefs. There are SNPs associated with how your brain reacts to alcohol. There are SNPs associated with all kinds of rare diseases with strange and interesting symptoms. There is such a strong association with SNPs and disease that there is no way you can do anything about disease if you ignore SNPs. The causes of SNPs can be pinpointed. This means we can prevent them from coming into existence. The ones that are inherited can be edited. Without knowledge of the Other Architect, and the changes in the procedure of SNP editing that will come from that knowledge, editing SNPs will cause unwanted mutations. To cure diseases we have to prevent the programs that predispose people to getting them and we have to prevent the SNPs that cause diseases (in a way that doesn’t cause mutations). I have made the discoveries necessary for all of this to happen. The next step is to pinpoint the exact causes of all the genetic programs and all the SNPs. After that, we’ll be able to do everything necessary to prevent, and to cure, diseases which have genetic causes. We’ll also have stronger immune systems and that will help us to resist diseases caused by viruses and bacteria.

While I was studying SNPs, the thought crossed my mind that it would be a good idea to speak at a genetics conference. I looked up upcoming genetics conferences and found one that was accepting abstract submissions. I wrote an abstract and submitted it. A few weeks later I got an email which said my abstract was accepted. The conference was six months away and I was 2,400 miles from where it was going to be held. At that point, I was a year and a half away from making the discovery that explained everything else I had already discovered. My plan was to present what I already found and make the point that what I was working on was something new for the entire scientific community to look into and that it would be worth everyone’s time. I started giving spontaneous presentations. Whenever a different way to start my presentation popped into my head, I would say it out loud and then continue speaking. A friend of mine who lived a thousand miles away from where the conference was going to be asked me to visit him. When I went to visit him, it was four months before the conference. I continued giving impromptu presentations and doing SNP research. When the conference was about a month away, I found out it wasn’t going to take place where I thought it was. I thought it was going to be in Boston, but it was in Florida. The conference started on July 15th. I’ve been in Florida before during the summer and I had problems breathing because of the humidity. I sent an email to the people holding the conference telling them that I wouldn’t be able to make it.

After studying SNPs, I started looking for what caused epigenetic programs. I had no idea how epigenetic programs came into existence or what caused them. I just knew they existed. I thought I was going to have to buy equipment and collect data. I thought it would take ten to twenty years to get all the data I needed. I started looking for people to help me. I thought I needed to have data-collecting stations in different parts of the world. I knew someone in Argentina, someone in West Virginia, someone in India, and someone in Australia. I figured those four locations were good places to start. The person I knew in West Virginia had some land and said I could use it. The person I knew in Argentina lived on a huge piece of land and said I could live there or send him what he would need to collect the data I wanted. The person in India and the person in Australia were people I met on social media. I hadn’t really talked to either of them.

Before going to West Virginia or Argentina, or talking to the people I knew in India and Australia, I found out that I didn’t have to collect any data. There are already observatories and data-collecting stations that are collecting all the data I thought I had to collect, and all the data is available online. I found all the online sources I could and started going through their data. After a year of going through all of this data I found the Other Architect.

After my discovery, I read everything I could find on genetics and epigenetics to see if anyone had already discovered what I discovered. I read scientific articles for eight months. What I read helped me to understand everything I had discovered for the past fifteen years of my life. Many of the experiments I read about would’ve had a different outcome if the scientists doing them had known about everything I discovered. There were ways different groups of scientists’ experiments were connected that the scientists themselves were unaware of, but that I could see. If you took certain aspects of their experiments that no one could see the significance of and put them together, you would come close to finding what I found. While I was reading everyone else’s work, I was starting to foresee some of the different technologies that would be made possible by what I was working on. I also realized that people living on another planet wouldn’t be able to survive without one of these technologies. I thought about how long it would take to verify all my work and how long it would take to do all of the experiments necessary to be in a position to make all the different technologies I had thought of. I realized I had to share my discovery as soon as possible because of how soon we plan to send people to Mars. The sooner everything began, the sooner the technology necessary for survival on Mars would be designed and tested. I decided to share it in a series of articles that gave the reader the experience of making many of the discoveries I made for themselves. I wanted to share it in a way that anyone, including non-academics, could appreciate.

I finished writing the articles in September of 2018. There were eight of them. I contacted a friend and asked if she would be interested in looking at them. I wanted input so that I could make all the changes that needed to be made in each of the articles. I read her the first article on the phone in late September, then sent her a copy. A couple of weeks later, I read her the introduction to the second article then sent her some data that she could verify. What I sent her could be verified in a day or two, but because people have busy lives, I let four weeks go by before I read her the third article. The third article also has data to verify, so I let another four weeks go by before reading her the fourth article. The fourth and fifth articles also had data to verify, so it wasn’t until February of 2019 that I read her the sixth article. By the time I finished reading her the eighth article, it was already late March. She was amazed by the last two articles (the ones which explained what the Other Architect is). It was good to have someone I could talk to about my work. We talked about all the different technologies and I made jokes about what some of the technologies could do. She didn’t give me any input on the articles though. She saw nothing wrong with any of them. I saw this as an indication that I needed to show them to more people before I published them. I contacted someone I knew I could trust and asked him if he would be interested in reading about something I’ve been working on. He said he would. I sent him the first article. I sent him the next one a few days later, then the next one four weeks later, and the one after that four weeks later. After I sent him the sixth one, he let me know that he wasn’t reading them. It was October of 2019 and I hadn’t gotten any input on the articles other than one person telling me that what they were about was something amazing.

As I mentioned earlier, every day that this project is delayed about 240,000 people are denied one of the benefits – prevention of the genetic programs that lead people to develop genetic disorders later in life. In 2018 and 2019, I was making a mistake I wasn’t aware that I was making. This mistake was causing delays in this project and those delays have already potentially prevented millions of people from benefiting from what I’ve discovered about life. I wasn’t forming a team of people to work with. If just one person was working with me, I would’ve discovered the Other Architect years earlier. With their help, I could’ve found funding for the experiment phase of the project, which means work on the technologies would be happening right now (or would already be done). If I had two people working with me, there would have been even less delay. One of us could’ve given the presentation at the genetics conference that I missed, and because we would’ve been at a more advanced point than I was by myself the presentation would have blown everyone’s mind. Not having a team of people is the biggest mistake you can make if you’re trying to share something new. A huge part of Darwin’s success in sharing what he discovered was the people who helped him by defending his work when everyone was attacking it. Many people had their work stolen from them because they had no one to protect them. Many people’s work was misused because they had no one to help them protect it from being misused. It’s the same with every project. If the right people work together, it succeeds. This project is going to need people to defend it when it’s attacked. This project is going to need people to protect what I discovered from being stolen. It’s going to need people to protect what I’ve discovered from being misused. I’ve spent years doing everything without a team. This has caused unnecessary delays. Everyone who I tried to get to participate in my project weren’t people who would have made a good partner or team member. I can’t do everything necessary to make this project succeed by myself. I can’t do all the experiments, all the fund-raising, all the legal work, all the writing, all the defending, all the relationship building, or all of the other things necessary to make this project a success. I can only do as much as it’s possible for one person to do.

Two Wikipedia articles that relate to this project are “Independent scientist” and “Citizen science”. Both articles help you to understand what I’ve been doing. The “Independent scientist” article has a list of “Notable independent scientists”. Familiarizing yourself with the people on that list will help you to understand the nature of what I’ve been working on and what kind of person I am. There are people mentioned in the “Modern-day independent scientists” section that aren’t on the “Notable independent scientists” list that you can also look up. The “Citizen science” article will help you understand how I would like to do as much of the project as possible. People all over the world can verify everything I’ve already found. This project has the potential to become one of the biggest and funnest citizen science projects in the world.

Something interesting about the genetic programs (epigenetic profiles) is that they have absolutely nothing to do with race or ethnicity. Anyone’s DNA can get any of the programs, regardless of what continent/s their ancestors are from. Genetic disorders that occur as a result of the programs that a person has occur in individuals of every possible genetic background. It is the same with the physical traits that occur as a result of genetic programs. These physical traits and genetic disorders have no ethnicity or race. Once people become familiar with all of these physical traits, they’ll have something to focus on other than race and ethnicity. Genetic disorders should have already made people realize that there is more to a person’s DNA than where their ancestors are from. The genetic disorders and physical traits that result from genetic programs also have nothing to do with gender. Whether you get cancer from your programs has nothing to do with your gender. Whether you get endocrine system problems from your programs has nothing to do with your gender. Physical traits that people get from their genetic programs also have nothing to do with gender. Many genetic studies are done with the assumption that everything about our DNA is determined by race (or ethnicity) and gender. They ignore the fact that people of every background and gender get the same non-inherited genetic disorders (on the same genetic disorder spectra) and are completely unaware of the physical traits that people have which have no race, ethnicity, or gender (other than obvious things like that we all have hair, and eyes, and skin, and bones). If you’re interested in ethnicity, race, and gender, the phenotypes (physical phenotypes and disease phenotypes) that occur as a result of genetic programs will be of great interest to you. The fact that genetic disorders have no race or gender hasn’t made as much of an impact as it should have on how we see DNA. The physical features that we’ll be sharing with the world, physical features that occur in individuals regardless of race, ethnicity, and gender will demonstrate that race, ethnicity, and gender are not as all-important as people would like to believe they are.

I didn’t discover that there were physical traits people shared regardless of their genetic background or gender until 2016. I wasn’t focusing on race, ethnicity, or gender. I also wasn’t trying to prove that they weren’t as important as everyone believes them to be. What causes the genetic programs/profiles has nothing to do with where an individual’s ancestors are from or what gender they are. The effects of the programs also have nothing to do with what haplogroup an individual belongs to or what gender they are. The programs that cause hyperthyroidism will cause an individual to express hyperthyroidism regardless of that individual’s gender, race, or ethnicity. Stopping the programs that cause hyperthyroidism (or any other genetic disorder) will succeed regardless of gender, race, or ethnicity. The work we’ll be sharing is evidence of the equality that we all inherently have. Along with obvious similarities (we all have fingers, arms, toes, legs, hearts, livers, et cetera), we also all have the same genetic programs/profiles. These give us many of the same genetic problems and many of the same physical features. Once people become familiar with these physical features, they’ll no longer be able to deny how similar all of us are. If I shared nothing else with the world other than just these physical features (and I have enough examples to make an encyclopedia), this project would still be something which caused major changes in society and in the field of genetics. If we decide to, we can share these physical features with the world while doing the experiments that pinpoint the causes of all the genetic programs which give people these physical features. It could help with everything, all the racial conflict and violence, going on in the United States, and help everyone in the world fighting for racial and gender equality.

Speaking of racism and sexism, in the United States, and throughout the world, it’s obvious that there is something psychopathological about it. To believe a group is superior to another group despite evidence contrary to the “fact” is delusional. Racist and sexist thinking are obviously on the mental disorder spectrum (it’s especially obvious when it’s extreme and leads to violence – in other words, when it’s psychotic). At the present moment, all that we have to help delusional people is antipsychotic medication. To stop racism and sexism, we could give racist and sexist people antipsychotics. It would be an interesting experiment, but there’s a better alternative. The epigenetic events which cause the programs/profiles that give a predisposition to mental disorders can all be pinpointed. This means all of those programs, and all genetic issues anywhere on the spectrum of mental disorders, can be prevented. You can also cure anyone whose DNA causes them to express anything on the mental disorder spectrum by reprogramming their DNA and editing all the SNPs associated with whatever symptom/s they have a phenotype for. People who are not expressing phenotypes in the mental disorder spectrum will be free from both delusional thinking and from psychotic thinking. Dealing with mental disorders in this way is better than medication because it’s more effective, it’s less financially debilitating, and it doesn’t have all the unwanted side effects.

What we’re going to be working on together is something that is going to make people healthier both mentally and physically. It is also going to increase our knowledge. Its purpose isn’t to make anyone wealthy and its purpose isn’t to make anyone famous. If we sell one of your NFTs to raise money for something and you become famous, you can leave the project if you want. If you try to join the project with becoming famous as your goal, I’ll know and other people on the team will know. What we’re going to be working on is something more rewarding than anything else the world offers. There are many wealthy people in the world and there are many famous people in the world. What we’re doing is on a different level. It’s something that doesn’t have rewards as its purpose. The experience of working on something like that is the greatest experience possible. If you can understand that, you’re probably someone that we’ll all be working with soon. You’re someone who is capable of doing things without ulterior motives. People like you are capable of doing really amazing things. It’s people like you that I’m looking for to be part of this.

By this point, you’ve probably already decided if this project is something you’re interested in or not. Let me tell you what to expect when you contact me. I’m going to ask you to do a personality test so I can get an idea of what kind of person you are. After that I’m going to ask you to do another test. Then I’m going to ask you questions. I’m going to do all of this because I have to make sure you’re someone who’s cut out for the project. The more we get to know each other, the more I’ll tell you about myself and about everything I’ve discovered. I’m not going to ask you for a resume or anything like that, and I’m not asking for donations. I don’t have any of the payment apps or accounts that people use to get money from other people. Whether or not our team is going to use any of these is something I don’t know right now. I’m more comfortable with raising money by selling or auctioning things we create during the project as collector’s items. If you’re interested in being part of this project, I suggest you start saving everything you make. Save any papers you write. Save any music you record. Save any pictures you take. Because you’re working on something that is going to make history, everything you make is going to be a collector’s item. Even if you make something that you don’t see as significant, the fact that you’re going to be part of history is going to give that something value. Save all your records. Save your journals. If you don’t have a journal, start one. You aren’t saving these things because your ego thinks you’re better than everyone else and you’re not saving them to make yourself huge amounts of money. You’re saving them because they’re going to be things of interest and value to people, and they’re going to help to fund all of the things we need to do. Make short videos of anything related to the project, or of things related to something the project is going to have some kind of effect on. Make voice recordings. All of these recordings are going to be historical artifacts and whoever owns any of them is going to be thrilled that they have something created by someone who was part of the project you’re going to be part of.

While I was writing the original eight articles in 2018, I started checking all the peer-reviewed articles on genetics published every month and all the online genetics news articles published every month. I wanted to see if anyone was close to finding what I found. I’ve been doing this every month ever since. It keeps me informed on what all the scientists are working on and everything they find. I’ve also done searches of anything related to what I’m working on to see if anything from the past thirty years comes up in the peer-reviewed articles and the science news databases. I’ve found many interesting things. Some things that I find help me to put my own work together better, but no one is doing the same work or anything closely related to it. In late 2020, I wrote another article. Since then, I’ve discovered some other aspects about the Other Architect and I have excerpts from several articles that I can put together. I have enough material for a tenth article. I’ll share all of these articles with you and once we complete our experiments, we’ll share all of these articles with everyone else in the world.

In the ninth article, I mention that it is possible to change a person’s genetic programs/profiles, but at the time I wrote the article I had no idea how to do it. Since then, I’ve figured it out. Once we pinpoint all the epigenetic events which cause all the different programs, we’ll be able to do it. It’s a two-step process. First, you have to deprogram the DNA. Then, you have to give it new programs. We have to completely understand all the programs and their causes before we can attempt to reprogram someone’s DNA. Deprogramming DNA is easy and takes less than a minute. Both processes, deprogramming and reprogramming, are non-invasive. We don’t have to cut anything open and we don’t have to inject anything into anyone. The reprogramming also takes less than a minute. After the DNA is reprogrammed, there is a short period of readjustment (about thirty minutes), then the DNA is analyzed and the person can get back to their life. Because of our understanding of the Other Architect, neither of these processes, deprogramming DNA or reprogramming it, will lead to any mutations.

Someone who has a genetic problem due to their genetic programs/profiles can have that problem fixed within an hour. If their problem is more complex (if SNPs are involved), there will be an additional step. That means it would take about twice as long. Reprogramming DNA and editing SNPs will cost less than current gene editing therapies (which can be over a million dollars over the course of your life) because it only has to be done once. Reprogramming without SNP editing will be even less expensive. In contrast to current gene editing therapy, genetic reprogramming will be something anyone can afford and you only have to go to the clinic once. Gene therapy done without knowledge of the Other Architect, and without the technologies that will come from that knowledge, requires you to go to a clinic several times to get your genes edited and you have to continue going your whole life (it also causes mutations). Our project is going to make curing genetic disorders something that will be available, and affordable, for everyone.

If this sounds like something that is going to upset people, if you believe there are people who profit off of sickness and that these people will do anything to prevent losing money, that isn’t going to be as much of a problem as you think it’s going to be. If there really are people like that, I figured out a solution to the problem of dealing with them (I’ve had years to think everything about this project over). The solution is very simple and I’ll tell you what it is after we start working together. There is corruption everywhere and many people are corrupted, but there are things you can do about corruption, and there are ways you can deal with corrupted people (and none of the ways I’ve figured out have been foreseen).

There are many people who say everything is corrupt and that there is nothing anyone can do about it. They say that we’re all being monitored. They say everything is controlled and that we should all be afraid. They think that saying these things shows that they are looking out for everyone, that they know more than everyone, and that they are people we should put our trust in. There are thousands of videos made by these people. There are hundreds, or thousands, of books and blogs written by these people. They say the same things over and over, yet are doing nothing about all the problems that they describe. If you are one of these people, or one of the people who think what these people tell you to think, this project is not for you. Things aren’t hopeless. What we’re going to work on together is something that no one has ever even imagined could happen. I’ve figured out how to deal with all the corrupt people we’re going to encounter without doing anything corrupt people themselves would do. Everything that everyone working on this project is going to do is great and everyone who is going to work on this project is someone great. Once everyone in the world finds out about you and the great things you’ve done while working on this project, you’re going to be one of the people whose lives inspire people to do something great. We’re going to succeed in doing something that no one thought was possible, and we’re going to succeed in not becoming corrupted by the things that corrupt other people.

If you would like to read about genetic programs/profiles, here is a list of peer-reviewed articles which are all available for free on the internet: Child Health, Developmental Plasticity, and Epigenetic Programming; Epigenetic Programming and Fetal Metabolic Programming; Epigenetic Programming of Synthesis, Release, and/or Receptor Expression of Common Mediators; Independent genomewide screens identify the tumor suppressor VTRNA2-1 as a human epiallele responsive to periconceptional environment.

Reading these articles will bring you up to date on everything that is currently known about genetic programs/profiles. What we’re going to work on is pinpointing the causes of all the programs whose causes are currently unknown. I’ve already found general causes, but we have to identify the precise causes of every program. Once we find them, we have to test them several times to ensure that we have pinpointed the exact cause of every program/profile. No one else is going to find them. Because I’ve already discovered the general causes, we’re already several steps, and several years, ahead of everyone else. Our work involves studying another genetic architect. The majority of people don’t even suspect that another genetic architect exists. All their work is confined to what they know about the one genetic architect that they learned about in school, and it is constrained by their belief that nothing exists outside of it. Once we find the precise causes, what we’ll be sharing with the world will be one of the biggest scientific discoveries ever made. We’re not just going to be discovering things that cause something else to happen, and we’re not just going to be discovering things that will help us to do things we weren’t able to do before, we’re going to be discovering something new about life itself. This discovery is going to change how everyone sees life.

How we see life has been the main limitation in many of our endeavors. The changes this discovery is going to cause in how we see is going to remove many of the obstacles we currently believe are insurmountable – in several different fields. I can foresee some of the things we’re going to be able to do that we’re currently incapable of. Whether or not any of us works with people working in these fields is something we’re going to have to decide later. So many things that were closed before are going to open up. The science of biology is going to completely change, and when it does everything related to it is going to change.

If you think we already know everything there is to know about life, this project isn’t for you. I’ve made discoveries about life that explain almost everything that no one has been able to explain and I still don’t think I know everything about life. Part of what is interesting to me about this project is the chance that we’ll discover something together, something that none of us have even imagined we could discover. I’m also interested in what other people, in all the different parts of the world, are going to discover.

In the future, people are going to look back on the idea that evolution explains everything about life as a prejudice that sane people would never have. Evolution was a revolutionary idea a hundred and fifty years ago. In the hundred years that it has been generally accepted, it has helped us to understand life more than we did before but at a certain point it started to limit our understanding. The people who champion evolution as the greatest concept we’ve come up with to explain life would’ve championed whatever the generally accepted explanation was before evolution. These same people would have reviled evolution when it was first presented to the public, and they’re going to revile the Other Architect when it’s presented. The people who put Charles Darwin on a pedestal now would not have done so a hundred and fifty years ago. They would’ve put whoever was generally accepted as important then on a pedestal and called Darwin a heretic and a fool. It’s easy to worship people who have made discoveries a hundred years after they’re dead, but actually listening to what someone who has made a discovery has to say at the time they first share it is not something very many people have ever done. It took years for people to take many of the scientists that everyone looks up to now seriously.

There are so many people seeking attention, and making so much noise, that it’s difficult to hear the people who actually have something to say. It was like that when Einstein first tried to share his work, it was like that when Darwin first tried to share his work, and it’s even worse now. Part of the challenge our project is going to face is figuring out how to present it. Science itself has become dysfunctional. The people who have made the biggest names for themselves as scientists have done so by either presenting work that will make some business sector huge amounts of money (but which is actually harmful) or by presenting things as true which aren’t true that flatter specific groups of people or that appeal to how people want to see themselves. The people, both famous and not, who try to perpetuate a conflict between science and religion are wasting everyone’s time, including their own (if they were doing scientific work, they wouldn’t have time to perpetuate conflict). If you examine what these people are really doing, you’ll see that what they’re trying to do is turn science into a religion, complete with idols (scientists from the past) and a clergy (themselves). They aren’t scientists. None of the great scientists of the past would’ve been interested in becoming clerical authorities or in worshiping anyone (or in being worshiped). Turning science into a religion is not something I’m interested in. Becoming an authority is not something I’m interested in. I’m here to do science and to share everything I find while doing it. If you can understand what that means and it’s something you’re interested in being part of, contact me. There’s so much noise and dysfunctional thinking in this society that I’m going to need all the non-dysfunctional (incorruptible) people I can find to help me continue my scientific work and to help me share it with the world in a way where none of the dysfunctional, corrupted, people can stop it.

In Darwin’s time, one of the biggest worldly powers, the Church, was opposed to his work. Today, worldly powers are no longer opposed to scientists’ work. Instead, they take possession of it and use it to further their agendas. To do scientific work through the usual channels, in other words by enrolling in a university or working for a corporation, is to give up having a say in how it is used or by whom. All the different worldly powers have become so interconnected that by helping one of them, you unwittingly help to further the agendas of others. Our project is going to be as free from all of this as it’s possible for any project to be. By being free from all institutions, our project will be free from all the corrupting influences of institutions. No one will be able to take possession of our work and misuse it because none of us will be interested in anything that anyone has to offer. We live in a time where it’s much more difficult to do work of any real importance, that doesn’t serve anyone’s agendas, than it was when Darwin was doing his work. You have to really think things out now to ensure that you don’t spend your time supporting things you would never want to support. You also have to figure out how to deal with all the corrupted people you’re going to encounter who are going to try to hinder, and corrupt, you. These are things people have had to keep in consideration for thousands of years. They’re issues that are so complicated and complex now that almost everyone gives up even trying to resist serving agendas and has given up believing that there is anything anyone can do about corruption. If you’ve given up, this project isn’t for you.

I’ve figured out the experiments that need to be done. I’ve figured out how to deal with corrupt people. I’ve also figured out how to raise some funds. Once we start working together and having conversations we’ll figure out everything else that needs to get figured out. Doing the experiments and then making the technologies ourselves will probably be the best way to do things. Once we reach that point, we can decide how to share the technologies. We can do experiments with the technologies and publish the results, then sell the technologies to clinics, or we can just open clinics ourselves. We could also sell the technologies directly to people. It’s something we’re going to have to figure out. I’ve heard people argue that a world without genetic disorders would be boring and that curing cancer would lead to overpopulation. I disagree. I think genetic disorders create so many problems, and dealing with them uses up so many resources, that anything that can help should be shared. I don’t think overpopulation would be the result of curing cancer. I also don’t agree that the world would be boring without genetic disorders. The other argument presupposes that suffering and conflict make life exciting. People who are mentally ill are suffering. People with personality disorders make other people suffer and cause conflict (I’m thinking about being in relationships with them or whenever they’re in positions of power or authority). There are some interesting books that were written by mentally ill people and there are some interesting works of art that were made by mentally ill people, but the people who created these works of art suffered immensely and people who have lost their children to cancer have also suffered immensely.

Discovering the Other Architect has made me think about, and look into, things that I never would have thought about otherwise. Because of the Other Architect, I became interested in the colonization of Mars. From what I’ve discovered, I know that there is a technology they’re going to need on Mars that doesn’t presently exist. The Other Architect also got me interested in genetic disorders and genetics. Because of my research, I’m now up to date on everything we know about genetics, epigenetics, and genetic disorders. Discovering the Other Architect also made me look into society and how we do everything. Making a scientific discovery makes you see aspects of society that most people don’t see. I’ve been looking into these things, and thinking about them, for the past four years. Before making the major discovery in 2017, I thought about the same things everyone else thinks about. Before that I was like everyone else, too, except for the fact that I spent over sixty hours a week for years of my life doing research. Now I realize the responsibility that you take on when you make a discovery. I’ve watched how irresponsibly other people have handled making one. I’ve seen how discoveries are misused. I’ve seen them be sold and marketed. I’ve seen them become part of dysfunctional thinking and corruption. Seeing all of this taught me more about the current role of science in society than I would attending a thousand lectures and reading a thousand articles. It isn’t the same science Einstein was doing or that Darwin was doing. What is called science now has agendas that the science of the past never had. When you start with a goal that comes from an agenda, what you’re doing isn’t science – even if you have a science degree. I do science the way people used to do science, without goals or agendas, and I’m looking for other people who are doing the same thing or who are interested in doing the same thing. If the dysfunctional thinking of the people you know, and of society, has confused you your whole life, it’s because you need to meet, and work with, people who aren’t entangled in it. I’ve always felt that I had to find people who weren’t dysfunctional, but from everything I’ve seen and looked into I now know that I have to find people who aren’t dysfunctional and I know I can offer them something, a project, which is free from dysfunctional thinking. I’m an ordinary person who made a discovery. The discovery changed my life. All the work that I’ve done since making the discovery has led to a project that can change the lives of all the people who work on it. What those people do together, along with me, can help to change other people’s lives. As long as we don’t allow it to become a part of all the dysfunctional thinking and dysfunctional behavior in our society, the change that it makes could be the change that society needs the most, or it could lead to the change/s that society needs most.

The project we’re going to be working on together is going to be a part of history. How we do the project is also going to be a part of history. The way we do everything is going to be extremely intelligent. It has to be. If it isn’t, it won’t work. Our group is going to do things in a way that other groups are going to adopt.

Part of the reason I made a major discovery is because I developed a new way of analyzing data. I can’t tell you what the method is here because it isn’t the right time. This new method of analyzing data is going to lead to discoveries in other fields. I know this is true because I analyzed data from another field using it, and I discovered something in that field that no one else has even suspected could be discovered. I’ll reveal that discovery later (when the time is right). The way I’ve been doing everything, and the way we’ll be doing everything together, is the way that scientists used to do things. To make discoveries requires new methods of looking at things. We all see the same things, but when you realize what you’re looking at has some kind of importance it leads to you figuring out a new way to look at it. Once you do that, you start to discover something. The more you look at it in the new way, the more you discover. This is how scientists solve problems. What prevents people from solving a problem is how they look at it. I invented a new way of analyzing, in other words of looking at, data. When other people look at data in the same way, they’re going to be able to solve problems that they couldn’t solve before and they’re going to discover things they didn’t know existed. If you read the Wikipedia article about Charles Darwin, you’ll see that he invented a new way of doing scientific research. It led him to make discoveries and to figure things out. Other people adopted his way of doing things and it had the same results. Now his method is considered antiquated and people don’t really use it. They use another method. That method led to discoveries and understanding, but it, too, has become antiquated. What we’re going to be sharing with the world is something found with a new method (a new way of looking at things). It’s going to require us to figure out a new way to share things. This means we’ll be sharing three new things with the world – a major scientific discovery, a new way of seeing things, and a new way of doing things. The sooner we do all of this, the better. With my method of analyzing data, people are going to be able to find, and figure out, things they couldn’t before. With the new way of doing things that we come up with (the new way of sharing things), people are going to be able to do things they weren’t able to do before and people who couldn’t share things before will be able to share things. This means we’re going to find out about things that the current ways of doing things prevent us from finding out.

Discoveries come from focusing on something that everyone else overlooks. Darwin made his discoveries this way. Einstein figured things out this way. What I discovered is going to seem so obvious to everyone a hundred years in the future that they’re going to be surprised that no one discovered it earlier. Part of the reason it’s going to seem obvious to them is because they’re going to easily see the same thing I see and aren’t going to comprehend that there was ever a time that people couldn’t see it. To me it’s obvious and I can explain it in a way that will make it obvious to anyone who listens to my explanation. The problem is that people aren’t ready to listen to me right now. It isn’t the right time. I’ll explain it to the people who work on this project with me and once they see what I see, it will change how they think about everything. What I see can be found, is visible, in everything. There is already a word in the dictionary that describes it. I’ll share the word with you when I explain what I see with you and how I came to see it. Once we share all our discoveries and technologies with the world, we’ll also share what we see and how anyone can come to see it. Seeing new things and learning new ways of seeing are some of the most exciting experiences possible. You’ll be giving both of these things to the world as a result of working on this project.

The method of analyzing data that I use was not developed in a day. It developed gradually over the course of fourteen years. If you examine other scientists’ methods, Charles Darwin for example, you’ll see that they also developed gradually over a long period of time. You become interested in a problem that no one has been able to solve because you discover something about it that everyone else has overlooked. As you examine the problem and your discovery, you try looking at it from different angles and perspectives. Eventually, sometimes after years of looking, you discover something else. Now, your method has become a little more sophisticated. Now there are two things you look at that other people have never found the perspective necessary to see. You go further into the methods you already used to see if they reveal anything else. You also try out variations of your methods. By doing this you discover something else. Along with these discoveries, you make hundreds, or thousands, of minor discoveries which all relate to, and confirm, what you found with your new ways of looking at things. As you continue doing this, your methods become more sophisticated and the amount of minor discoveries you make gets into the thousands or tens of thousands. You continue looking into all the different aspects of the problem until you’ve discovered everything you could possibly discover about it (you can make the minor discoveries for the rest of your life if you want since there are so many of them to make, but at a certain point you need to stop and move onto the next phase). Then, you figure out what all the discoveries mean. By doing all of this, you’re doing science the way the scientists of the past, the ones we all admire, did. I’ll tell you all the details of how my method developed and all the discoveries I made after we start working together. Later, when we share our work with the world, we can tell everyone else all the details of the discoveries and the method I developed to make them.

Trying to figure out what all your discoveries mean takes time. Jumping to conclusions is a mistake, and sharing hastily made conclusions with people is also a mistake. The current paradigm in the science world is to be as hasty as possible about everything. Many people who are well-known in the science world are well-known for sharing hastily made conclusions without even making any discoveries or developing any new methods to analyze data or solve problems. Many of them are well-known for “proving” that one of the scientists from the past was right about something. Many “discoveries” are hastily sold and commercialized. They’re touted as something great, while their dangers are ignored, by the press before anyone even knows everything about them. Part of the reason for this is the dysfunctional drive for profit on the part of corporations and the dysfunctional desire for fame and recognition on the part of the scientists. Real discoveries take time to make and to understand. None of the scientists of the past did “science” the way it’s done now. They didn’t start with the goal of making a company wealthy or of becoming famous. That is one of the major reasons that they were able to find everything they found and solve all fo the problems that they solved.

Of the over one hundred epigenetic programs that I’ve discovered, variations of forty three of them are associated with the mental disorder spectrum (that’s over 30% of all epigenetic programs). This is part of the reason many people are dysfunctional. Around 25% of people in the world have a diagnosable mental disorder, but many more people are on the mental disorder spectrum. They don’t have all the symptoms of any known mental disorders and they don’t completely behave like individuals who do have any of the known mental disorders, but they do have some of the same problems and they do behave in some of the same ways. These forty three genetic programs affect neuronal development. Problems with neuronal development can lead to mental disorders and to gastrointestinal disorders (since the gastrointestinal tract is lined with over a hundred million neurons). Everyone’s DNA has at least five epigenetic programs. Most people have between seven and nine. Since almost a third of all epigenetic programs caused by non-nutritional factors can lead to having mental problems somewhere on the mental disorder spectrum, this means almost everyone has the potential to become dysfunctional. Factor in random epigenetic events and SNPs that lead to problems somewhere on the mental disorder spectrum and it will start to make sense why there is so much dysfunctional thinking and behavior in the world. Someone might lie constantly, but not have a diagnosable mental disorder, and their dishonesty makes them dysfunctional. Someone might have no conscience which makes them dysfunctional – but not as dysfunctional as someone who has all the other traits of a psychopath. Being anywhere on the spectrum can cause someone to be dysfunctional, either all the time or on occasion. Being in the mental disorder spectrum causes people to not develop fully psychologically. People whose psyches don’t develop fully are compulsive, they violate others in some way, they spend their time overcompensating, and they use people – in other words, they’re dysfunctional. It’s been a major problem for as long as human civilization has existed. Once we pinpoint the causes of all the variations of the forty three genetic programs that cause neuronal problems, we’ll finally be able to do something about all the dysfunctional thinking and behavior in our society. We’ll finally be able to do something to end child abuse, police brutality, racism, and all the other dysfunctional things we haven’t been able to figure out solutions to. All pollution and mass murder (war) are connected to the fact that the majority of us are somewhere on the mental disorder spectrum. Once the programs that lead to neuronal development problems are no longer ones that almost all of us have, our society will have noticeably less dysfunctional thinking and dysfunctional behavior (in all of its forms).

Being incorruptible means you aren’t afraid of anything and that there’s nothing anyone can offer you to make you betray what you’re doing and who you’re doing it with. If you want anything you’ve seen in a Hollywood movie, you’ve already been corrupted. If you want to feel more important than other people, you’ve been corrupted. If you want to have more than everyone else, you’ve been corrupted. If you think it’s important for you to be right, you’ve been corrupted. If you think what other people do is wrong but nothing you do is wrong, you’ve been corrupted. If you do and say whatever it takes to make people like you, you’ve been corrupted. If you idolize anyone, you’ve been corrupted. If you can’t see through all the lies that are told to people in this dysfunctional society, you’ve been corrupted. If you have trouble paying attention or following through on the things you start, you can’t be part of this project. If you talk about people behind their backs, you can’t be part of this project. If you get angry for no reason and say hateful things, you can’t be part of this project. If you throw tantrums, you can’t be part of this project. This project is something that is going to make history. The people who are part of it need to be worthy of being a part of something on that level. If ego has no control over you, you’re completely incorruptible and worthy of being part of this project. If you can do things without fear and without wanting something (without ulterior motives), then you’re incorruptible and worthy of being part of this project. If you don’t think it’s possible to not be afraid and to not have ulterior motives, you’ve been corrupted.

There are television shows about science and there are movies and television shows with scientist characters, but there are no television shows or movies about someone who has made the kind of discoveries I’ve made. There are no television shows or movies that have any characters that are like me, no television shows or movies about someone who meets people by writing a book, and no television shows or movies about a group of people who make discoveries together and create new technologies. There are also no movies or television shows which show a world that has any of the technologies we’re going to make together. Because people aren’t used to watching stories about the kind of project we’re doing, they’re not going to know how to react. I haven’t met any of you yet, so I don’t know if there are any television shows or movies with characters that have personalities similar to yours, but because people aren’t used to cinematic and televisual portrayals of people like me they aren’t going to know how to react to me. They’re also not going to know how to react to this book. What we’re doing is something so great that its greatness can’t fail to be recognized, but because it’s something that’s so outside what everyone is used to the recognition may not come until years after we first share our work. Einstein published his work on relativity when he was twenty six. It was so far outside what everyone was used to that he didn’t get the recognition his work deserved until he was forty.

If you google “the cost of gene editing,” you’ll see that it costs between $500,000 and $1,500,000 because you have to get your genes edited for your whole life. If you google “gene editing causes mutations,” you’ll see that besides being extremely expensive, gene editing is also extremely dangerous. You spend a million dollars to “cure” your diabetes and you get mutations that give you cancer. With the work that we’re going to do and the technology that’s going to come from it, genetic disorders can be cured for less than a thousand dollars. If you have three disorders on the endocrine system disorder spectrum, you’ll get all of them cured at once. If you have three disorders on the mental/gastrointestinal disorder spectrum, you have them all cured at the same time. Everyone will be able to afford it. You could take someone to get their genetic problems cured on their birthday (or on Father’s Day or Christmas) as their gift. They get their DNA deprogrammed and then reprogrammed with all the programs it had before minus the one/s that caused them to have genetic disorders. One of the variations of that/those program/s that doesn’t/don’t lead to genetic disorders is actuated instead. We aren’t trying to make ourselves rich and we’re not going to put anyone’s life in danger. We’re also not going to work on any technologies that are going to make everyone exactly the same or that make some people genetically superior to other people, or any of the other things that dysfunctional people think gene editing should be used for.

If we don’t start this work now, the earliest anyone else will start anything similar will be in 2050 when the genetic problems start happening in the Mars colony. Because we aren’t dysfunctional people, our project is going to be done without any dysfunctional goals. If other people do the same work, their project is going to be completely different. The outcome will be deformed by dysfunctional thinking and dysfunctional behavior. Instead of making cures for genetic disorders affordable for everyone, they’re going to do it in the way that makes the most profit. Many people won’t be able to benefit from the technology.

There was a period of time when I thought that sharing this work might not be a good idea, but now I realize it would be better for people who aren’t dysfunctional to do the work now than for dysfunctional people to do it later. If we work on it together now, it will be something that will inspire people for years to come. If dysfunctional people work on it later, it will turn into something that will only inspire more people to become dysfunctional. It’s our responsibility to share this great discovery, the discovery of another genetic architect, in a way that is as great as the discovery itself, because if we don’t it’s going to suffer the same fate as everything else that dysfunctional people get in their control.

Earlier I said that if you idolize anyone, you’re corrupted. If you’re eighteen or nineteen and you idolize someone, that’s normal. If you’re much older than that, it’s a bad sign. I used to think that people became corrupted in their thirties, but from my own experience with people I’m beginning to realize it happens much earlier than that. Many people that I knew when they were nineteen became completely dysfunctional before they turned twenty six. It’s a combination of things that causes this to happen. The variations of the genetic programs associated with neuronal development that lead to a predisposition to having problems on the mental disorder spectrum combined with societal forces that make people dysfunctional completely changed the people I knew. That is how PTSD works. Someone has a predisposition to having a mental issue, then they have an experience that triggers it. It’s the same with sexual disorders. The person had a predisposition, then an experience, or a series of experiences, led them to a specific mental issue. If we help people to not have the variations of the programs that give them a predisposition to mental issues, or mental disorders, then their experiences won’t trigger any mental problems (dysfunctional thinking and behavior). By doing this we also help to lessen the societal factors and forces that contribute to dysfunctional thinking and behavior since most, if not all, of these are perpetuated by dysfunctional people. I’m not saying this because I have any kind of age bias. I don’t have that kind of bias or any other of the biases that are common in our society. You can be any age, ethnicity, or gender and be free from dysfunctional thinking and behavior. During our first email exchanges, you’ll let me know, by your answers to my questions, whether you’re dysfunctional or not. If you are, that means you won’t be working on the project. This doesn’t mean we can’t be friends, or that you’ll never be a part of this project in any way. Being dysfunctional doesn’t mean you’re a bad person, it just means you have a variation of a genetic program that predisposed you to being that way. Most people are dysfunctional. Some of them know they’re dysfunctional, but most of them think that they aren’t. The project I’m starting will help dysfunctional people with the genetic causes of their problems. Nothing else helps people to stop being dysfunctional because nothing else does anything about the causes of their dysfunctional thinking and behavior. The people who can’t be part of the project now, but want to, can be part of it later. I won’t forget about any of you.

If only three people work with me, we’ll succeed in doing everything that needs to get done. All the experiments that we need to do will get done. All the technologies that need to get made will get made. We’ll be able to figure everything out and we’ll have some really great conversations while doing it. If you’re not afraid and you’re not self-involved, in other words if you’re not dysfunctional, send me an email. You already knew before getting to this paragraph that this project was something that you were interested in. You want to meet me and I want to meet you. You’ve never wanted any of the things that everyone around you wants. You never thought any of the things they thought were important were that important. You’ve seen all the things that people do and you want to do something different, something on a different level. You’ve been looking for someone like you for your entire life. A couple of times you found people you thought were like you but they all turned out to have the same agendas, the same fears, the same self-centeredness, as everyone else. When you realized everyone around you, and everyone in the world, has problems and issues, you wanted to help them. You’re someone who isn’t dysfunctional and you’ve been looking for other people who aren’t dysfunctional. You’ve also been looking for something that can help people to stop being dysfunctional. This project is what you’ve been looking for and I’m one of the people you’ve been looking for. Some of the other people you’ve been looking for are going to contact me. This project is how we’re all going to find each other and do everything we’ve been wanting to do. I look forward to meeting you.